(skeletor is leading by example by adding that unnecessary apostrophe…)

    • MikeWey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      My bank doesn’t allow the characters you would need for a SQL injection in passwords. Checked client side, I don’t want to try and find out if it’s also checked server side, but I hope it is.

      • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No serious software would fall for such an easy attack anymore. With prepared statements it’s impossible to break queries like that. Beside that one principle is to avoid using user inputs directly in your database.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      There was a (really short-lived) shady car dealership that used to have an A-Frame sign that they must’ve paid to get printed.

      It said “Your approved”.

      My approved?

      I imagine someone must’ve mentioned it to them, because they replaced it not much later.

      The new sign said “Everyones Approved”.

  • Tyfud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    While on the topic, this isn’t how passwords work in systems.

    Passwords are stored as one way hashes. So it’s cryptoed only in one direction, it’s lossy, and can’t be recovered back to the original password.

    When you log on, your cleartext PW is hashed in ephemeral memory/storage and then the cleartext password is thrown away.

    That hash is compared to the hash in the DB. If the hash matches, then you have access. If it doesn’t, then your PW is incorrect.

    • tool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      While on the topic, this isn’t how passwords work in systems.

      Passwords are stored as one way hashes. So it’s cryptoed only in one direction, it’s lossy, and can’t be recovered back to the original password.

      When you log on, your cleartext PW is hashed in ephemeral memory/storage and then the cleartext password is thrown away.

      That hash is compared to the hash in the DB. If the hash matches, then you have access. If it doesn’t, then your PW is incorrect.

      Oh my sweet Summer Child. This is definitely how it’s supposed to work, but there are plenty of services that just don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.

      Have you ever been on a site that has a stupid-low character limit for a password? There’s literally no reason to do that, all the hashes are going to end up the same size in the DB anyway regardless of the original string length. Even bcrypt’s max secret character limit is 70-something characters.

      Ever change a password and have it not work on the next login because they’re silently truncating it after a certain character limit? Ever get an email with an actual password in it?

      The only reason you would do things like this is if you’re storing/processing passwords in plaintext and not hashing it client-side first.

      I can think of 3 offenders of this off the top of my head. It’s a lot more common than you’d think.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, I mean Crypto libraries.

        The field of science and engineering that has the algorithms and libraries we would need to use to perform a proper one way encrypted hash, is going to be found in a cryoptographic library.

        I suspect you’re thinking of Crypto in how it’s applied colloquially in the world today with a cryptographically signed linked-list ledger. There’s a whole world of cryptography that’s in use. Encryption is just one sub-function in that world.

      • Wilzax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Encryption is inherently reversible though. Hashing is the most accurate term to describe it

      • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        And there are plenty of bad systems, especially in this fail fast BS paradigm clueless idiots like to use. We know because they keep getting hacked (looking at you, lastpass!)

        Yes, I’m a waterfall guy - get off my lawn!

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Even if it’s hashed, some systems still use unsalted MD5 which is effectively just as bad as plain text.

      I don’t understand it. Argon2id has been around for nearly 10 years at this point, scrypt for 15, PBKDF2 for 20 and bcrypt for 25. It’s not hard.

    • teejay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sure, but the comic isn’t talking about legit password usage systems. It’s talking about how a comma could break the csv formatting of a csv file that came from a data breach and dump.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        That’s still not how it would work.

        Ok, assuming that we’re talking about, like you say, a system that gets a breach which is storing PWs in clear text/plain text, instead of hashing it, which is a big if as those kinds of systems are either amateur/homebrew, or extinct at this point, but I digress. Let’s say it’s there.

        The attacker would run a sanitization script out of the SQL table that would shift those problem characters into proxy characters, or correct them if it’s going to cause a problem. One or two passwords lost to correct for thousands isn’t a big deal. The result of trying to put some sort of SQL Injection or CSV formatting bug into your password, hoping it was stored as plaintext, and the attacker wouldn’t be sanitizing the common formatting issues, is just silly.

        Plus, it’s not like they’re only exporting it once. They’ve usually copied the DB down locally, so they’ll see the formatting is skewed when parsing the CSV, and correct it on the next export out.

        I’m all for the humor here, I was just calling out that nothing about the ideas the OP suggested would work in real life SecOps scenarios.

        Souce: Am engineer at large corporation. Deal with scenarios and systems like this all the time.

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The CSV cells are escaped with quotes. So just maybe throw some quotes in too. Unbalanced for style points. It won’t defeat a CSV library, but might break a script kiddie

  • Waldowal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The CSV specification (RFC-4180) is pretty clear. If a value contains commas, you wrap it in double quotes. If the value contains double quotes, you double each double quote to indicate its part of the value and not the end of the value.

    A properly formatted CSV should have no problems from Skeletor!

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There’s no formal spec for CSV. The RFC you mentioned describes the most common behaviour observed in many implementations, but it’s not a spec itself, as mentioned on the second page:

      While there are various specifications and implementations for the CSV format (for ex. [4], [5], [6] and [7]), there is no formal specification in existence, which allows for a wide variety of interpretations of CSV files. This section documents the format that seems to be followed by most implementations:

      • GiveOver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you’re a company, you should save your users’ passwords as “hashes” which is like a scrambled up version, so if your data gets stolen the hackers will have to unscramble all the passwords which takes a long time. Some naughty companies don’t do this and save their passwords as plain text. The person above is presumably talking to developers to remind them not to be naughty

        • Agent641@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          For the benefit of the person above you, thats not to say that hashed passwords are unbreakable, because hackers can build a thing called a rainbow rmtable where they hash a bunch of known passwords, words, and phrases, and then can compare their rainbow table agains a stolen hash to learn what the starting value might have been. Thats why a complex password is very useful

          • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I wrote my own password manager about a year ago, in java. It uses Vigenère encryption using a key the computer doesn’t remember (that you have to write down somewhere). I still don’t actually use it in my daily life, firefoxes password manager is pretty convenient and I’m pretty lazy…

            • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              By the way (you’re quicker than duckduckgoing) Are you able to view and export password in plain text if you want to discontinue using the firefox password manager?

              I’ve resisted using password managers up to this point, but it’s getting to be a pain

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    From many years of experience on the interwebs, I can recommend this password:

    NUL,\t.;TAB\n\x07^C

    It’s very secure and works most of the time. I use it for everything.

  • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Most CSVs these days are separated by semicolons, so make sure to add one of those as well!

    To protect against shitty databases, add one of every quote ("'`) to your password so inserting the password fails.

    To fuck with computers that don’t know how to do UTF8, add a few emoji.

    To limit the risk of Chinese hackers, add a Taiwanese flag 🇹🇼. Their iPhones can’t render that glyph!

    To make sure millenials can’t read your password, 𝔀𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓲𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮.

    Then to top it all off, add a right-to-left override character to invert the direction of the password halfway through.

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      To make sure millenials can’t read your password, 𝔀𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓲𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮.

      How would this mess with millennials? I think you mean gen z.

    • Toes♀@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To fuck with computers that don’t know how to do UTF8, add a few emoji.

      I once set a WiFi ssid to 🌻 and I was amazed at how much problems that likely caused. I had people showing me their network manager was dumping random characters. Some other routers web interfaces became corrupted when trying to show the neighborhood. Some clients refused to connect. Even a bsod on a windows XP box.

          • Spaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            64 characters long is wifi spec IIRC but some routers don’t follow spec, wouldnt go higher than 60. Idk if this helps answer your question.

          • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            32 bytes. 31 if you want to end the name in a \0 byte to not completely break IoT devices and the like.

            You can have as many SSIDs as you want, of course. So you could spam a million SSIDs and have a piece of software decode them.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You just need to ensure you validate character by character (NOT byte by byte) and allow characters in the Emoji Unicode ranges. It’s well-defined in the Unicode standard. Using a library is a great idea though.

        • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m currently in a project where the client has a custom, but not entirely consistent or known subset of utf-8.

          They want us to keep the form content as it is, but remove the “bad” characters. Our current approach is to just forward everything as it is and wait for someone to complain. How TF am I supposed to remove a character without changing the message?

          • Toes♀@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah I had a backend with poor support for anything that wasn’t ASCII. So my solution was turning everything into hex before storing it. I wonder if people are still using it.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Yeah I had a backend with poor support for anything that wasn’t ASCII

              PHP is like this. Poor Unicode support, but it treats strings as raw bytes so it usually works well enough. It turns out a programming language can take data from a form, save it to a database, then later load and render it, without having to know what those bytes actually mean, as long as the app or browser knows it’s UTF-8, for example through a Content-Type header or meta tag.

              The tricky thing is the all the standard string manipulation functions (strlen, substr, etc) don’t handle Unicode properly at all and they deal with number of bytes rather than number of characters. You need to use the “multibyte” (Unicode-ready) equivalents like mb_substr, but a lot of PHP developers forget to do this and end up with string truncation code that cuts UTF-8 characters in half (e.g.if it’s truncating a long title with Emoji in it, it might cut off the title in the middle of the three bytes that represent the Emoji and only leave 1 or 2 of them)

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I had an emoji in my phone hotspot a while ago. Unfortunately I had to remove it after a while because some devices refused to connect.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          This isn’t really true. If it were the financial world would be incredibly unstable and untrustworthy, and nobody would keep their money in banks.

          Banks do tend to be behind the leading edge because their systems are thoroughly tested and have to be stable. They have to be regularly audited and there’s a lot of oversight. Change control processes are inherently slow. Given a choice between rapid and flexible or deliberate and reliable, banks will take the cautious route.

        • Xyre@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I emailed my bank about this a few years ago. Never heard back but to my surprise they actually updated the password restrictions! I should send another email asking for MFA and virtual cards…

          • veroxii@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Jeez mate you gotta get on that! You have the magic powers and you’re holding back civilization’s progress with your procrastination!

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            virtual cards

            Do you mean tap-to-pay, or do you mean card numbers you can use for online purchases?

            • Xyre@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              I think a more apt description would be proxy cards. It’s relatively new, but it lets you create cards that are linked to your primary without ever issuing a plastic card. This way if fraud happens you only need to replace it for the services it was used on. Or if you happen to lose your physical card, you can have it replaced without affecting the others.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Why is our money based on debt? Why do banks keep getting away with nearly collapsing the global economy? Why do private institutions have the right to coin currency?

          Because banks put themselves in extremely risky situations, and civilization is based on the idea that money has value and the law is enforced. So laws get passed whenever they’re in danger (usually self inflicted)

          Banks have security through legislation. It’s extra illegal to hack them. And since that’s the case, what’s a little more risk for a little higher profit? -_-

        • Xin_shill@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Truly ancient Cobol running in the back is my only guess. Why they wouldn’t have their authentication systems completely separate with better security features and some sort of token based access to the backend is beyond my understanding of their back end.

    • The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      To make sure millenials can’t read your password, 𝔀𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓲𝓽 𝓲𝓷 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓮.

      Hey, millennials know cursive!

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Forced to learn it in elementary school because “highschool and college require it!” by Boomers that didn’t recognize the tech revolution only to get to college and be told by those same boomers to never turn in a handwritten paper unless you wanted an auto fail.

    • Thomas@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      To fuck with computers that don’t know how to do UTF8, add a few emoji.

      Even better, add some byte sequences that are invalid UTF-8.

    • nezbyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      CSVs are supposed be comma-separated files. Microsoft deviated from the specification and decided some languages would use semicolons for CSVs.

      Source: StackOverflow

      • nom345@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Using comma would probably caused more problems as it is a decimal separator for those languages. My excel also uses semicolon in formulas instead of comma when separating parameters. Some VBA scripts break when using different language settings and some forumilas don’t translate automatically to different locale so they just give an error. Overall using excel in different locale setups is annoying.

        Best separator I have used is | as i have never seen it in the data as an input. Comma and semicolon both have caused issues in the past for me as they might pop up at wrong places.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Microsoft deviated from the specification

        There is no specification for CSV, which is why it’s such a mess and different parsers and renderers have wildly different features. The closest thing to a spec is RFC4180 but that RFC simply describes the most common features across several CSV implementations, and is not actually a spec.

        I agree that it should be comma separated though. My understanding is that it caused issues in countries that use a comma as a decimal point.

        Also, Excel sometimes uses tabs rather than commas or semicolons.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Z̵̫̖͚̳̖̖̰̩̀̆͐͒͝ä̸̛̻́̈́̌͂̽̈́l̷̤̥̖̝͙̅g̵̱̤͙͕̥̮͌̽o̸̡̦̙̬̘͎̪̥̔ ̴͔̙̞̱̗͒͊͊̽̀̑͌ẏ̵̛̻̾o̸̡͍̤͔͌ų̶̠͔̯̲̖͇̯̅̒̓̃̏̓͊r̷͎̪̗̤̄̊̃̚͝ ̵̢̰͔̀t̵̡̘̤̙͕͎̅͂͛̀̚ȩ̷͙̙̖̲̟͍̉̎͝x̷͇̦̝̼͗͋̊t̶̫̹̳̩͇̼̠͚̿͆̅̋̔̃͐͗!̶̧̛͕̮̻̞͎͇̹͆͛͘̕̚͠

    • J'Pol @lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Here’s my confusion: as soon as it is no longer separated by commas, it is by definition no longer a CSV. Is it an SCSV now?