I mean Venom is injured all the time in ways that would clearly impact a body within it. So either the host body goes full caterpillar-coccoon and is basically jelly while Venom is fully formed, or the host’s body becomes immune to injury/near fully regenerable, in which case Venom could wreck the host’s face without worry.

All of venom’s mass is already clearly pulled from the meat dimension, so what’s a little more for a glam rock tongue?

deleted by creator

Treat yo’self

Reminds me of the Venetian Snares track with noises that are pictures of his cats run through a spectrograph in reverse

No kink shaming

Yes, exactly. I think that’s what the post is highlighting…

“What? This is absurd”

“Humanity verified”

Moore’s point is that we shouldn’t let the inability to eliminate that “what if,” which was specifically designed to be non-disprovable, actually affect ontology. That problems and questions created by philosophers basically just to stump philosophical methods should be all but ignored since, by design, there clearly can’t be an answer except that one thing is by far most likely, and the other thing cannot matter because we can’t prove or act upon it or treat it as anything other than a manufactured source of doubt/skepticism.

Apparently now you’d have to go to Gozo (with dive gear…) to get a shot like this!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MT_Hephaestus

That’s no way to talk about yer partner if you ask me

Only because the dreams of digital security and privacy (and functionality) died first. If I could be confident doing work and personal stuff on the same devices, I would.

Why not air allow yourself something that you like to look at and will look at often? Especially if it means looking at your phone less.

Plus even someone (smart) with an AP can respect a cool $60 watch, doesn’t have to be a status symbol or for others at all. (And in fact the first thing people realize when they start watch collecting is that 99% of people aren’t looking at them.)

They make minimalist and ana-digi wave ceptors that are pretty sweet. Plus a classic square g shock model will have very little clutter, even less on a Timex Ironman if you like that look.

Digital watches are sweet and have very specific advantages in certain contexts. Douglas Adams just doesn’t get the G Shock hype!

I hate when when people misuse apostrophe’s

Ja Rule has really taken their art in a new direction

Purple line should be inverted. I’m buried in my phone the moment a sex scene comes on while watching a movie with anyone else

Setting a low b(e)ar, Canada

I mean you asked the question like you didn’t understand that? Instead you make it seem like you think this is truly meant to reflect gendered responsibilities and expectations in a relationship. That is pretty goofy when the whole thing is clearly a setup for a punchline calling mac n cheese “wet food” for humans.