• ZephrC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it's at +4 and 83% upvotes. That's just 5 upvotes and 1 downvote. There's always that one guy.

    • arc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also probably a misclick

      I've discovered many posts that I've managed to downvote without realising… I go through my profile every so often out of curiousity

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about the community but it could be against the intention of the community.

        Someone might disagree with the group nature of the proposed commitment. They might be thinking that social commitment dilutes the commitment to the self that’s the key factor in taking control of an addiction.

        It’s foolish to always assume anyone who disagrees with your methods is an asshole looking to cause pain. Sometimes people just don’t think what you’re doing is going to work, and they want it to work, so that’s why they oppose the plan.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The app I manage gets a very small but steady stream of 1 star reviews that say “great app, thanks!”

  • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meh, fuck the downvotes. Its an important daily post in an important community. I really enjoy the accountability it provides.

    But is not gonna be for everyone. Most people are normies who are good with never drinking or only have one or two every few weeks at best.

    Maybe they just want it off their homepage. Who knows?

    Edit: And I saw it suggested elsewhere it could just be a misclick, which is very possible. Either way, just keep on keepin' on!

    • rbhfd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or people that drink much more often, see this post, and find it too confronting for themselves.

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That makes me kinda sad actually, but the reality is, you could be right.

        It's a pretty hard thing to wrestle with the idea of sobriety if someone can't imagine living their life that way. I get it. I'm a partier at heart who always wants to be out and about with people socializing, and the bar is the easiest place to gather other adults.

        Hopefully if they are someone who wants to cut back, (and can do so safely), they take a peek in and see that it's not meant to be judgey. If someone checks in for a day or two and not the next, no one is coming after anyone/shaming anyone/questioning anyone. Just come back the next time you don't wanna drink. It's that low threat and chill.

        I'm a verbose individual so I write novels, but most folks are legit just like "Not drinking today", and leave it at that. Whatever works, right?

    • nandeEbisu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably people who just didn't want it on their feed and didn't know how to block the channel.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Downvoting wholesome posts is almost as bad as complaining about downvotes.

  • Thoth19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's also entirely possible that someone just really doesn't like that such content exists. Stop drinking is meant as a support group for alcoholics. But it's messaging sounds a bit like moral crusading against alcohol. And that sounds like the sort of thing someone scrolling through a front page would take objection to.

      • Uprise42@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I think we need more voting options. Some that I would think would expand on up/down votes:

        I like this
        I don’t like this but the content is good (think news articles delivering good journalism on bad news)
        I don’t like this and don’t want to see more (irrelevant content to you)
        I disagree with this post
        Content is irrelevant to the community
        Content is spam/harmful/etc

        That’s obviously not what they would be called, but those are the feelings the votes should convey. And those can be expressed in a simple upvote downvote front to end users as well.

        I like this and I don’t like this but the content is good both deliver upvotes

        I don’t like this and don’t want to see more doesn’t do either, but tells the algorithm that you don’t want to see that stuff (I don’t even know if any fediverse stuff ranks with an algorithm.

        I disagree and content is not relevant both downvote, and content is harmful both downvotes and reports in one action

        • DigitalPaperTrail@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          and you could streamline it as a list of emote-like buttons that convey each of those options somehow. the binary good/bad that we have now has led to a non-trivial amount of people taking it way too personally or obsessing over the singular number - a lot of times it's easy to go straight to thinking of the worst case scenario, and that way of thinking about social media usage exacerbates a lot of mental health issues that've been revealed in all those studies linking them (social media and mental health)

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well ya, it's not about Linux, FOSS, or hatred for cars. Lemmy only likes those things.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    People downvote the weirdest shit for the weirdest reasons sometimes.

      • FireTower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I meant to proactively remove your own post from circulation. Communities that are for things that the stereotypical Lemmy user doesn't agree with like the Christianity or Conservative one tend to get down voted by people outside the group even if the particular post is a good post for that community.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Was it posted in their own community or is it an advertisement for their community posted in another community?

    If it was posted in the /stopdrinking community, that's a bit bizarre (though possibly being voted on by people who happen to see it while browsing everything at once). But if it was in any other community as an ad, it would make a lot of sense.