• emax_gomax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I actually really like winrar. Is it my format of choice? No, there’s open free alternatives. But it was a legit better product developed by like one guy that they then proceeded to give free access to with a license that incentivises paying them for their work and has probably raked in insane sums from corporations over the years. It’s what happens when you have a Microsoft like idea without the endless greed to sprawl into a billion dollar company.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It wasn’t a better product, it was worse in every measurable way but one: You could split archives into arbitrary sizes so you could steal warez off Usenet in 1-floppy chunks. That’s it. It’s a ho-hum product at best.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah that’s called a bag of holding and it would be worth 1000x that. Hell I’d probably save up all my Pennie’s for that.

    • Ydna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah… I’d buy some of this stuff to be ironic, but it doesn’t look very good 🤷‍♂️

  • Khlo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    People are making fun of it in the comments, but i ordered one on restock day and I’m excited!

  • Lightsong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Tbh I never found out about 7zip until like when I was 30. And I’m 33 now xd. I used WinRAR for years.

    And I will say, 7zip is much better. No offense to WinRAR. I got much respect for WinRAR.

  • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Libre software selling whatever they can is good for maintaining development.

    If the Linux kernel ever changed to AGPLv3 I would for sure buy one GNU/Linux stable release each year to make up for corporations that would ban Linux from their network due to AGPL3 legal obligations.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Prob those companies will go back to windows server or freebsd lol.

      • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        For the sake of basic security, there should be a lot more corporate adoption of OpenBSD and FreeBSD. Company networks would be a lot more secure than using Linux due to Linux’s schizophrenic nature. Ask a full time BSD sysadmin their view on Linux.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      corporations that would ban Linux from their network

      You can’t change the license retroactively. Corporations would likely hard-fork the kernel at the last GPL2 commit and move it to a restricted but compliant access model like Red Hat did.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        You can change the license moving forward though it takes a tremendous amount of effort.

        Only rich companies have dedicated full time kernel developers. The vast majority literally take full advantage of the fact that the kernel is free (gratis). And any changes they make to the GPL2 kernel is still subject to open source disclosure.

        I believe Torvalds has publicly stated that he wouldn’t support a move to GPL3, let alone AGPL.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s fascinating to me that people prefer shitty nagware over 7-zip only because they think they’re “getting one over” by not paying for inferior software and/or feel nostalgic for it.

          • cley_faye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            For a good while, the UI in 7-Zip was so atrocious merely extracting an existing archive was not obvious. It definitely improved over that.

            I’d argue that even today, WinRAR UI is more intuitive than 7-Zip, but it is largely irrelevant since both have decent integration with windows file explorer anyway, which was also something 7-Zip lacked for a while.

      • admin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I feel nostalgic for WinRAR and I don’t need or want the fucking bag. Fucking.rar was the first file extension I remember learning at like 6yo that wasn’t something dumb like .txt .jpg .doc .ppt .exe

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Oh, I’ll have to try that, it looks nice. I tried PeaZip because the 7zip UI didn’t sit with me well initially; I’ve gotten used to it since then but I like the way NanaZip looks from the screenshots; I’ll try it!

        Edit: Wait – Is this a WINDOWS-Only package? Eww… nevermind.

          • kitnaht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            Even when I do use windows packages, I always try to use ones that are Linux supported as well; so when I do finally make the full-time switch, the transition will be easier. But I find I always just do tar -xvf or unzip in a command line over there anyhow >_>

    • Noxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Why did you pay for winrar? Would you still do so today or do you find that free/opensource alternatives are as good or better?

      • Hazel『They/Them』@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Idk about the person you replied to, but I always told my self I’ll pay for this if I ever get a well paying job. Eventually got a high paying job, and paid for a product key.

        Ofc mass layoffs I’m back to struggling but at least I kept the promise I made to myself.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I’m a developer, too, and I did shareware/donationware ages ago.

        I simply paid WinRAR for their work, from one honest developer to another.

        And no, I would not pay today, as this was just for a windows box I used for a job at that time, and where I needed a halfway decent archiver tool, which Windows does not supply out of the box.

        I usually work on Linux, where lack of fundamental tools is not an issue.

  • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I bought WinRAR, for a pretty specific reason: It can handle Japanese locale. The assorted games, patches, manga, and so forth couldn’t be handled by 7zip/PeaZip at the time.