• Cows Look Like Maps@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It was kill the carbon tax or get Poilievre. Carbon taxes work and it’s a shame that all the propagandised conservatives made carbon tax political suicide but here we are. I’d still take this over PP who wouldn’t stop at the carbon tax.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Carbon tax and dividend is greatest tax in human history. Not meant to raise discretionary revenue. Not a pension scam subject to bankruptcy or payment reductions in future. Car rebates is not good policy, because its not car ownership that affects emissions, it is miles driven. Or lifestyle choices that don’t need cars/long driving.

    The rise in diesel/home heating fuel was a direct result of Ukraine war. Carbon tax is divisive because all the parties love the war on Russia, and so no one addresses/d the real reason for the cost of living hikes.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes I’m disappointed we had to cave to the conservatives but if that’s the price of avoiding a PP PM I guess I can live with it. I’m not planning on having kids so I just need to feel bad for the polar bears.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But the CPC ads with red glows and ominous music keep telling me he’s “Carbon Tax Carney”!

  • veee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Carney kills consumer carbon tax in first move as prime minister

    And with it PP’s entire campaign identity.

  • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Before we get all doomer up in here (generally fair), I genuinely believe this is a smart play and exactly in line with Carneys stated plan. Carney does believe in the carbon tax as both a way to put money in most Canadians pockets and to reduce our emissions. He has said fullstop that the Carbon Tax was effective and good. He has said he wants to “cancel the carbon tax and replace it with a consumption pricing model” - which is effectively just rebranding the Carbon Tax. And he said so directly, that the carbon tax is effective but has become too political and is an unwinnable battle politically, but the core function should be maintained. Based on his public history I do believe he’s an environmentalist, so I do trust he’ll follow through with a replacement.

    I think this is smart politically because the Carbon Tax and proximity to Trudeau is essentially PP’s only play. In one shot Carney takes away the last of PP’s cards, which may be enough to cement a lead for the coming election.

    Admittedly this all hinges on him actually getting a replacement in, but based on his history of public statements for the past few years, I do believe he will. If he doesn’t, feel free to come back next year or whatever and yell at me. For now, I’m huffing my hoping here.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Assuming he does follow through, I’ll call this a very smart play.

      A big problem progressives often have is understanding the value of branding. Sometimes the right play is basically to do the same thing but with a slightly different label on it. Or, in this case, a slightly different thing that basically does the same thing but comes without all the baggage.

      • assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Agreed. This is very contingent on the follow through, but it also makes sense. There’s two scenarios:

        1. This helps him win the election or get a minority government. He immediately puts in a functionally equivalent replacement. Move worked.
        2. He loses the election and we get a Conservative majority. They would have immediately repealed the Carbon Tax, so it’s irrelevant.

        Let’s see how it plays out.

  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Well, fuck. That’s income I could have really used. This negatively affects people living in poverty the most, and benefits the affluent the most. This better come paired with some kind of financial break for low income earners.

    I feel like this signals that Carney is willing to cast aside his principles and throw uninvolved people under the bus so that he can meet his priority goals. Ie, getting ignorant swing voters on his side. This is a blatant campaign move that should have been an election promise, not a unilateral decision.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is disappointing

    It’s even more disappointing that I would bet money that gas stations will not lower their prices by the same amount as the tax because of this. They’ll go down maybe 5 cents and claim it’s the savings.

    The average family is going to lose money from dropping this policy, they were getting more from the rebate than they were spending on the tax.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re correct. But the carbon tax is so widely misunderstood and hated that continuing to push it is political suicide.

      I begrudgingly respect the Liberals decision here, even though I strictly disagree with the outcome.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m not gonna lie, this tax did nothing for me. It did not influence my purchasing decisions. I already hardly drive my vehicle, but when I need to get somewhere I don’t even have any other option than to take a vehicle.

      I’m also certainly not going to heat my home any differently, so it is what it is and I just kept paying.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You think the pumps will see a drop, as long as PP does not say anything about the carbon tax being dropped the gas stations will stay the same.

      Yes people will find out that Carney did that on the news but PP will come up with some new nick name and people will forget.

      • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Anyone could do a cursory search and find that the fuel charge rate is currently $0.1761/L for gasoline. They could also see, with this same search, what the price was, is supposed to be, should be, and might be.

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You could also look up the wholesale cost of gasoline, compare that the current advertised price to figure out what the specific gas stations normal markup is, then see if the wholesale price changes on the date the carbon tax is removed to find out if the gas station was taking an extra big cut.