Me: The internet ;) ;)

Maybe now I can splurge and buy butter.

I have to applaud these mental gymnasts. It must be exhausting to shift your identity from cult to cult.

Back-zips are back in style! Farewell Star Trek soundstage, I will never not see you!

Don’t feel bad. You’re only getting downvoted because MacRumours didn’t post it first.

And here I thought this community was being sued.

That’s what I thought was happening as well. The camera cutting back and forth between their expressions is what convinced me as well.

Makes sense when you lay out the steps like that.

[…] the department said in its letter that it has decided to cancel her citizenship because Townsend’s mother didn’t take her oath before Townsend was born.

What triggers are in place for the government to review ancestral citizenship history?

Didn’t help that this only played in my city for a limited time in select theaters. Give us blurays!

Do you concur?

Oh geeze, you’re right. Changed!

How about campaigning for better healthcare access and mandatory minimum hospital wait times? Maybe controlling grocery profitability? Housing developer profits?

*checks notes*

Ok, just mad about a rebate.

Says video is not available.

I’ve got a bit of a spoilery kind of question:

I can’t even fathom the problems someone with a $400K salary has to deal with.

She said she was then advised to withdraw money from her bank accounts and deposit it through a Bitcoin machine, where it would remain in an account for safekeeping until the investigation was over.

That poor woman. Even if she hadn’t seen all the other red flags, this was the flare gun shot in the night sky.

My take is that it’s a Starfleet origin story post-Archer.

EDIT: looking up the timeline of events that puts us somewhere between 2155-2258. I’d say there’s probably a movie within those 100-odd years.

During that committee, the Conservatives proposed 19,600 amendments to the 18-page bill. That number decreased to 200 once the bill left committee and headed back to the House of Commons.

Government House leader Steven MacKinnon said Thursday those amendments were “robo-amendments created by AI.”

[Conservative Leader Pierre] Poilievre now will have to have his members come here and vote for as long as it takes on a couple of hundred amendments that survived that robo-amendment process that they admitted was undertaken by artificial intelligence, by robot caucus members and robot parliamentarians," he said.

99% of the amendments were actual GPT-fluff.

Why does this necessitate being a televised event? Sounds like this is just going to be a set-up to dunk on climate policy for sound bites without accomplishing anything meaningful.