• x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every country knows the US changes faces faster than my ex girlfriend.

    At this point other countries just need to deal with 4 years of this bullshit.

    If Trump were to take over the government like Hitler did, which looks to be the case, only then would countries start looking at dropping the USA.

    • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. There’s no telling what comes after these 4 years. The US has proven that they aren’t an ally worth relying on, we should look to more reliable partners and building them up and vice versa. Any concession or help offered by the next administration isn’t worth the paper it’s written on (just look at trump ripping up his own trade agreement for this nonsense.)

      We need allies not a neighbour that on a whim might try to throw us into a recession.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly. With a Presidential Monarchy, no deal or treaty can be trusted past the next election (assuming they’ll still have those).

        More than more Trump, we are also seeing a complete abandonment of the US much vaunted system of checks and balances. You simply can’t deal with them except in 4 year periods.

      • x00z@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If you look back at the history of the US, it’s been fairly reliable in it’s first world alliances.

        • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, they’ve pretty strongly turned from recent history though. No one in NATO believes the US could be trusted to uphold article 5 anymore. That’s the whole issue.

          Hell, why doesn’t Ukraine have the nuclear deterrnet that it had after the collapse of the Soviet Union? Because they foolishly believed American security promises, which were given in exchange for them releasing their nukes.

          • x00z@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Exactly. But it also shows it’s more about Trump than America.

            Plus we got other stuff to worry about, and playing nice with America is probably better in the long run.

            • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              What? Ukraine was first invaded before trump and then again without him there. In both cases, the security provided was less than what was originally guaranteed. Ukraine got screwed by believing America.

              It’s not just trump, there’s a whole Senate and Congress cheering him on. I would not gamble our future by relying on it to only be a trump phenomenon. If Americans had elected him once and horrified of their mistake, never came close again, that’d be one thing. But we has elected with a plurarlity of votes.

              America has proven an untrustworthy ally and that thwir promises aren’t worth the paper their written in.

              I don’t think Canada’s security should be “well, let’s just hope they don’t do it yet again!”

                • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Oh absolutely, thank heavens trump is cartoonishly cruel and selfish, it’s quickly united everyone else. A clever, subtle and patient trump would’ve been much more dangerous.

                  I just fully disagree with the earlier comment that this is a one off trump only aberration.

    • daellat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Europe already has a program for a 6th gen in the works for 2040 or 2050. Saab should join it! However in the meanwhile the gripen-e is an excellent aircraft yes.

  • redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    As should europe. Clearly you can’t trust the USA anymore. What is the long-term prospect for spare parts?

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “No u” come on with the childish shit. Yes we could trust Europe you dumb dumb. America literally wouldn’t exist without French support but you wanna be a contrarian so bad you just ignore everything and type out this moronic dribble

        • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can even look into much closer history - look at the participants of Enduring Freedom. Nice to see how respected the life’s of our citizens, who died in Afghanistan or elsewhere, are to people like that.

      • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Spoken like someone from the very very shallowest side of the gene pool. You’re a mouth and an anus and not much else.

      • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Kindly - shut up. All those countries you don’t trust followed America into Afghanistan, many into other wars. All lost citizens in support of American and joint interests, we did our part, as allies should. Guess we now know who is the real untrustworthy partner, and I doubt any of us will forget the betrayal anytime soon.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Idiot moron piece of shit retard. Go give Putin a footmassage and the keys to your house you bootlicking degenerate creature.

    • Iceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      From what I’ve heard you need a password that changes on the daily to start a F-35 and that the US are the only ones that can provide it. If that is true, it’s a tremendous oversite for any sovereign state.

        • Bev's Dad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Quick search seems to say that US planes might have the code thing but exported planes don’t. Although they do have control over updates and the code for everyone except for Israel that requested access to the code before buying.

      • redlemace@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        wait…WHAT??? it doesn’t sound unlikely (tesla can be disabled remotely by tesla), but why would you buy it in such case? That’s why I voted the piracy party a couple of times. Not because I fully agree, but just to get people with at least some IT knowledge in

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won’t be on Trump’s radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    With a potential for an american invasion on the table, I wouldn’t want to cancel that deal without another similar plane deal lined up

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada, I don’t imagine the F35 would be much help in that situation. I am sure there are remote access capabilities to cease their operation, at the very least.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada

        Until a few weeks ago I did not believe the US would impose tariffs on Canada or call it the “51st state,” so…

        • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          The tariff go around happened last time, which is how we ended up with the NAFTA replacement. The “51st state” nonsense was projected previously, which is more about his ego and his belief that he has a lot of support in Canada.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You have to enter a password to start up the F35. That password changes every day and USA needs to give these passwords. Locking a country out of the plane is as simple as stop sending the new passwords.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Hmm, opinions on the internet on if that’s true are mixed at best. It’s a level of control I’d be shocked anyone would accept. Someone on Quora is saying most countries weren’t even happy Lockheed Martin manages the supply chain and maintenance software.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think an invasion could realistically happen. 1. Need congress to authorize a war that would impact U.S. soil and 2. need the military which isn’t under trumps thumb

      But making sure they have another deal is smart, probably delay the f-35, and get maybe the euro fighter or so. Solid planes and itd be horrible for U.S. to lose a military contract in NA to an EU. Get the military industrial conplex pissed at trump.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s a hell of a lot of “Congress has to authorize” that’s being blatantly ignored right now.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the President has a 30 day authority to use the military anywhere in the world. After 30 days he needs congressional authority. He can get a second 30 days while that’s going on and if Congress says no then he has to remove all troops within a final 30 day period.

        If Congress never says anything then he effectively has a blank check.

        Your best bet would actually be to run TV Ads trying to get the military to refuse the order. I think a large percentage actually would. I also think he’s going to invade Mexico first and if he does invade Canada he’ll do it like the Russians did Ukraine. (They told their troops it was a training mission and then only told them at the border that it was real)

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      the potential for an invasion is precisely the reason you don’t want the f-35 around. that warbird is the most technologically dependent device ever crafted for warfare. it is deeply vulnerable to an adversary with the knowledge simply bricking it remotely and you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think the us military wouldn’t brick all of them. the better plan is to train with prior gen jets and asymmetric combat using drones.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t forget the Gripen. There’s a great offer for domestic production still on the table, and it’s the asymmetric stall-an-invasion fighter.

      • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Put the funds from that cancellation toward a contract with Ukraine for advanced drone technology and the capacity to manufacture it domestically.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Russian drones are better. Fiber optics overcome all radio jamming. Destroys all the things. Ukraine does not have excess production. Canada peace with Russia means that NORAD is us protecting the US, instead of allowing their BS that they are protecting us. US should pay a lot for NORAD.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            that doesn’t really make sense given that the situation is that the US and Russia are aligned and Canada is not aligned with them. if Canada were aligned, the F-35s wouldn’t be a concern at all

    • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they were serious about invasions they wouldn’t deliver. We’re better off with Gripens IMO but she’s an even more expensive option.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

    Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

      I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we’re never getting them, though.

      • barbarossa@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If I had hair, I definitely would have been pulling it out at the time. It’s not like this situation came out of nowhere, but normalcy bias won the day.

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nah, y’all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.