![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
If so, it’s still probably deliberate, because corporate knows full well a bigger box would work too. Eshittification is coming for our nuggies.
Formerly u/CanadaPlus101 on Reddit.
If so, it’s still probably deliberate, because corporate knows full well a bigger box would work too. Eshittification is coming for our nuggies.
“Pulling methane out of the ground reduces greenhouse gases, actually” really seems to be what oil and gas is going with next. I kind of think it will work worse than just flat denialism did, because you don’t even need science to notice that’s fishy.
Well that’s a damn shame. I’m glad to hear there’s living exhibits elsewhere too now, though.
Oh, it’s definitely marketing nonsense. The question is if they managed to hide a sane, usable product underneath it, or if they’ve added some kind of anti-user nonsense to prevent you from repurposing the button.
Jesus! (Or Isa?) Some of these were like single localised events. I was just thinking about how many people come through without even bringing that into it.
Well, I guess a casual disregard for the life and limb of non-elite non-Saudis is pretty on brand for them.
Uhh, normally that would be a crazy number, but it’s Hajj. Is it still a crazy number?
There is a room with a large-ish group of people in it. Someone has won a lottery. How many people in the room have winning lottery tickets, if you had to estimate?
An MP being a spy is more likely than winning a lottery, but I still think it’s fair to say most aren’t.
How? I’m pretty sure the commentators have said there’s no mechanism to do that, exactly in Han Dong’s case.
One of these days, a banana is actually going to cost that, and then this joke will no longer work. Hopefully not for decades though.
Funny enough, real estate preforms worse than just an index fund, usually. The difference is that a mortgage makes not regularly paying in much more difficult.
But yeah, the underclass tends to rent.
The “total number of owners” link goes here. I’m not really sure how to read what come up, though. I actually wonder if the site was bugging out.
Here’s the actual exchange. Not to give them traffic, but maybe like me you want to click through to something else.
According to other people in that thread, it goes down to 30% or 40% if you don’t include people who just live together with a homeowner. Honestly that doesn’t change the story much for the purpose of OP, IMO.
People who own one or two houses are not rich
If they own two, they’re definitely rich, although not big-R Rich. A house to live in and a rental is basically a retirement fund all on it’s own. Even one makes me think you’re in the middle class and doing okay.
65% of the population owning 90% of the wealth isn’t that surprising
Agreed.
when in reality the problem comes from the government spending money wherever and not applying strict foreign home purchasing laws that keep increasing home prices.
Neither of those things have caused the housing crisis.
I have a strong feeling you’re in the picture here, as a homeowner.
Or maybe pump it into a well to displace oil out. My impression is she simps for oil interests way harder than farmers.
A bit. It sounds to me like he stopped it as soon as he caught wind of it - there’s a lot of projects the US government is doing at any one time.
I have never, ever heard this definition of Luddite.
Yes, that wasn’t a random example for anyone OOTL. The thing the OG Luddites would do is break into factories and smash mechanical looms. They wanted to keep doing it the medieval way where you’re just crossing threads by hand over and over again, because “muh jerbs”.
I think that’s standard, actually. I can always do it at least.
Can confirm. My server has had federation issues, and when that has happened you can still post or vote on outside communities, but it’s not mirrored anywhere else.
I often feel like that too, but there were things like haggis and sausage before them. It’s good to remember that turning inedible mush into something appealing actually has a long and noble history.