• boywar3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Blazing Saddles would be called dated and “done before.”

      It was originally made as a way to laugh at Westerns, which, up to that point, had dominated the market. A lot of the tropes and plot lines the movie rips on are explicitly there because they were usually in these “safe” Westerns.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Mel Brooks sort of put the fork in Westerns. They were maybe dying anyway, but after Blazing Saddles they had to change pretty significantly.

        He also got everyone to laugh at all the little polite racist themes that were super common in Westerns. He hung a pretty big lamp on that stuff. You couldn’t do it again, because we’d all just laughed at how stupid it was.

        As for people who say it’s too offensive for today’s audience, idk that they ever realized they were being laughed at, not with.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      They absolutely could. If Dave Chappelle can do 5 hours of shitting on trans people, a Jewish writer can write a scene where a plane is wearing a tallit with a beard.

      • JamesTBagg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        No they wouldn’t. That logic has not stopped one single, shitty remake and almost all of them have been worse than the originals. So bad we forget they even exist. Robocop, Mummy, Red Dawn, Total Recall come to mind… garbage. I think Road House, Twister, and Mr & Mrs Smith are getting remakes this year, and they don’t look good either.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          None of those movies exist. You just made that up! And they definitely never did, and never would remake Point Break. It would be futile and pointless to try to remake such masterpieces of their eras, whose stories really only work in the period they were created.

    • TAYRN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Blazing Saddles openly called out racism and made it the butt of almost all of its jokes. I think both it and Airplane could be made today, and would be received well. Why do you think differently?

      • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Idk maybe the sheer number of racial slurs said by white characters. I don’t think that would fly in today’s political landscape.

        • TAYRN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          You don’t think that openly mocking white people who use racial slurs would fly? How so?

          • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I just think it would be idiotically cancelled for even having that kind of behavior in it in the first place.

            • TAYRN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why do you think that would happen? Can you give me some examples of media making fun of racists and getting “canceled” as a result?

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            He even did a western where the racism was front-and-center, and the constant stupidity of it all was just hilarious. That doctor’s reaction as they ride into town tells you exactly what kind of movie you’re in for.

            • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              Truthfully, I don’t watch many movies or keep up with Hollywood. I feel like the art of filmmaking died with the invention of CGI. Deadpool kept me in stitches tho. I finally watched it last month. I know white people got all upset about a black Ariel but gave no notice that it was otherwise a bad screenshot of the cartoon. What other bullshit are folks getting all boycotty over?

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Jokes involving racial stereotypes can be funny and inoffensive if what you’re making fun of IS the stereotypes, not the race. The writers of Airplane! being Jewish themselves, I reckon they knew exactly what they were doing. At least the bearded plane is clearly an example of making fun of the stereotype, not the people.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      if what you’re making fun of IS the stereotypes, not the race.

      Tell that to my American friends if the N word comes up. Yeah, some things for some people are so wired in as associated with offence or trauma it’s better to steer clear. At least in real life. Public media is weird because it’s kind of to everyone and no one at the same time. I’m glad some films/etc can make fun in ways some find offensive, but I’m glad I’m not the judge of it!

    • Cihta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wish it was so simple. Really it should be. A word can mean any number of things based on context or inflection but now i have to really be careful as to not offend. I feel like that’s a created thing.

      Obviously i say things in a friendly way or in a mean way and I feel like we are just going the “you can’t say that word” route. When it’s not the word, it’s the context.

      As such, yes anyone who finds that picture offensive falls into that group. It was also a great movie. Let’s dissect Spaceballs for racism next!

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    People have gotten less sensitive over time, we just don’t laugh at someone saying the n word or making light of sexual assault any more. I grew up on the dark web and the things people say/do nowadays blows even some of the worst stuff I seen there out of the water. Society is maturing, not regressing. Ignore the whingings of hack comedians who still think squinty Asian eyes and bad accents are the pinnacle of humor.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It really is. 44 year old movie and all of the jokes still land. Gen Z kids will especially appreciate the white flight attendant speaking in Jive to the black passengers.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    how about the topless shot halfway through this PG movie?! it feels like there is a lot of content they would never achieve that rating with today.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you can still maintain a PG-13 rating as long as the boobs shown are not directly sexualized and they only appear in one shot or scene.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That preceded the PG-13 rating.

      PG movies back then had more swearing and brief nudity like that scene in airplane was fairly common.

      Stuff like that is why PG-13 came about. American parents didn’t like it when their children saw two frames of boobs in a movie.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Ski Patrol, Police Academy 2, and Airplane the list goes on for 80s movies with a single brief topless shot.

      I’d argue the self-aware humor of Airplane was really calling out stereotypes like the one pictured, and defusing tensions with humor. Now Revenge of the Nerds, there’s a problematic movie.

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Breaking and entering into a sorority, barging into private rooms and house showers/bathrooms, stealing property, and installing hidden cameras in their rooms in order to casually spy on them while they are naked, sleeping, etc. Capture images of the sorority girls naked, make hundreds of copies of those images, and share them with the entire campus to win a school-sponsored competition for a student government seat. Rape a woman while sharing said porn of her and her friends with the entire student body. Said woman then falls in love with her rapist. All played for laughs and zero consequences for any of it. An 80’s hit! Make 3 more sequels of it!

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Don’t you think they just put that in there to warn us all? That with information technology transforming the world like no-one ever imagined, even the best nerds still aren’t without their flaws. Like Jobs or McAfee

          • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            You forgot the scene where one of the nerds wears a mask and pretends to be another person in order to sleep with the hot chick. Definitely not sexual assault!

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s toward the end, he’s wearing like a Darth Vader mask or something and let’s her think he’s her boyfriend while he fucks her. That’s rape.

              • ButtDrugs@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Oh shit yeah I forgot about that part. It’s been probably 10 or 15 years since I’ve seen it. I thought the panty raid and hidden cameras were bad, but damn, that movie did not age well.

    • HonkyTonkWoman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Airplane was released in 1980, before the PG-13 rating existed. I’m not sure how the film would be rated today, but I’d wager it would hit PG standards without significant edits.

  • KISSmyOS@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As a German, this is one of the few movies where the dubbed version is just as good as the original, in parts even better.
    Especially the part where they’re speaking Jive, which is “translated” into a thick Bavarian dialect, including subtitles saying something completely different:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEkI0cH_rK4

    And for some reason, they translated the movie’s title to “Die unglaubliche Reise in einem verrückten Flugzeug” (The Incredible Journey on a Crazy Airplane).

  • CatMaster5001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A native speaker can correct me, but I believe “Hjelp, vi flyr!” is “Help, we’re flying!”

    https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjelp,_vi_flyr!

    Google translate seems to screw up with the missing comma as on the IMDB list, but if you add it it translates properly.

    https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hjelp,_vi_flyr!
    https://translate.google.com/?sl=no&tl=en&text=Hjelp%2C vi flyr&op=translate

    Compare with the missing comma. https://translate.google.com/?sl=no&tl=en&text=Hjelp vi flyr&op=translate

    That’d be maybe, “Hjelp oss å fly!”

    Seems supported here: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TranslationMatchmaking

    In Norwegian, a whole ton of completely unrelated movies start with the words "Hjelp, vi" ("Help, we"), followed by whatever the main characters in the movie are doing.
    Airplane - "Help, We're Flying"
    ...
    
    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It might offend some overly sensitive Israelis or Zionists but they are not representatives for all Jews.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure you’ve met a real Israeli in your life if you genuinely think this would be offensive to them.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Are you Israeli? I ask because you only took the parts of my comment you wanted then got mad at me about it. Or maybe all Israelis are “overly sensitive”

    • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t (and I’m not Jewish), but I can see how it might.

      The way I see it, if it was a joke to poke fun and it was good-natured, it shouldn’t be offensive. I mean the Zucker brothers who were writers on the movie are themselves Jewish, so they thought it was hilarious. All that being said, I don’t get to speak for Jews as to what they find offensive.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m just curious because I’m Jewish and I don’t know of any Jews who would find this offensive.

        If the plane was rubbing its hands together and yelling “oy vey shut it down” I’d probably hear a dog whistle somewhere.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe if it were an ad for an airline.

      I can’t really imagine why people would think so, in context if the movie.

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The directors (Zucker brothers) are themselves Jewish. Any cancel culture reaction would as silly as the fake-controversy over Speedy Gonzalez, everyone in Mexico who heard about it were scratching their heads in puzzlement, how some white people who got hold of a bullhorn puffed themselves up like a peacock in heat virtuous “white savior who knows better than us” gatekeeping.

  • dukatos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago
    • Would you like something to read?
    • Do you have anything light?
    • How about this leaflet, “Famous Jewish Sports Legends?”
    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I mean, the producers (David and Jerry Zucker) are Jewish themselves, so these jokes in Airplane are self-deprecating

      EDIT: “were” to “are”; AFAIK the Zuckers are still with us 😅