• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would both love and hate to hear a “serious” Star Trek fan’s explanation for her ability to basically do that.

    • FlatFootFox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Universal Translator is basically magic. TOS came closest to describing how it works, and it boiled down to, “IDK man it does some brain scans to detect your language structure”. There’s no satisfying answer as to why it knows the “Washington State Bridge” is a combination of a proper noun, a geopolitical concept, and a general noun.

      In Enterprise, the Universal Translator is generally depicted as a modern miracle of technology, but one without useful internal intelligence. If it hears a few snippets of Romanian, it’s just going to start brute forcing a translation matrix with every technique it has at its disposal. More speech gives it more data to work with, but it’s still just cycling through its options.

      Sato’s familiarity with xenolinguistics allows her to aid the Universal Translator by narrowing the system’s options or directing it down specific paths. She doesn’t know or learn the alien languages in the traditional sense, but she’s shown for having a knack for picking up on patterns and syntax. Again with the Romanian example, she’s doing the alien equivalent of saying, “This sounds European, skip trying to translate this as an Asian language for now”. The Universal Translator has fewer options to run through and gets to a successful translation matrix faster.

      But again, it’s plot contrivance space magic.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        But again, it’s plot contrivance space magic.

        That’s what the people at r/DaystromInstitute will never accept. And that’s the entertaining part.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          And that’s the entertaining part.

          Correct. The entertainment comes after you’ve suspended your disbelief, ie literally avoided critically thinking of something — on purpose, because then you can enjoy the fiction more.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            I agree there, but I meant the entertaining part was watching the r/DaystromInstitute folks and those like them seek desperately for a scientific explanation.

    • invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s pretty simple to start at the fact you have a species that can read the thoughts of other people, even outside their species, and even inject thoughts into those other beings minds. So there must be something detectable that sentient species emit that can be detected and understood, and can also be pushed at them. Once that mechanism’s understood, a machine can be developed to apply that to language. Sato is really good at using that machine.

      Of course “magic box” works too.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      So, as someone whose last job was in ai:

      Sigh, yeah, this is basically how it works…

      Throw unimaginable amounts of data at a GPU, you convert words to numbers through an algorithm called word2vec, then correlate between the words in context, English on one side, unknown language on the other, just looking for any connection at all. If the vector products are above a threshold (we call that activation) then there might be a relationship.

      Once you have it you experiment with it, try to make more associative connections building on that. The gpus just churn endlessly till they go ‘bing’.

      We did a simpler version as humans with the Rosetta stone, it had Greek, which we knew, and 2 forms of Egyptian, which we didn’t.

      Yeah the show is ludicrous in having someone point to a broom, say ‘mekh’ and the next sentence is ‘I’m afraid the current structure of relations in the alpha quadrant requires us to demand you no longer perform warp travel through our sector as we do not tolerate antimatter reactions under our religion’ translated from ‘guh-tah!’

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Handwaving tech and physics is easy. I’m not touching linguistics, other than to say I don’t think you can explain it away. Languages are hard, even if by some magic all species everywhere have some common base, which I doubt.

      • Potatisen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think in ToS Uhura knows a bunch of different languages and she’s like “this bit is similar to this language and this bit is similar to that language”. I always thought that made some kind of sense.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m sure the folks at r/DaystromInstitute would come up with all sorts of ludicrous explanations.

    • NegativeNull@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe it’s been explained, but on Earth, there are many languages/cultural dialects/regional-slang/etc. Those all are absent for the Klingons/Romulans/Ferengi/etc.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        Dialects are mentioned in Enterprise. In the first episode Klang’s dialect is the reason Enterprise’s UT can’t lock on and translate. Later It’s mentioned in the Augment arc that Enterprise has been programmed with 7 klingon dialects.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Admittedly I’ve been thinking I’m overdue to rewatch nearly all of Ent, but I have a vague memory of this getting explained (in a hand wavely kind of way). Maybe in the scene where Archer tells small children they recycle their poop? Or maybe my brain invented a scene to maintain my suspension of disbelief.