• Kroxx@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was a lot of speculation and no confirmation, this is confirmation

        • Kroxx@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          2 months ago

          The steamdb change doesn’t list the reason why, doesn’t confirm if it was a push on Sony’s or Valve’s end just that a change occurred

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Steam doesn’t push changelists from developer accounts, and don’t push it themselves without making a major announcement. This is why all the reporting on this has been clear AH/Sony delisted it. There are countless articles confirming this days ago.

            Article from 2 days ago

            Sony made the strange decision to delist Helldivers 2 from over 150 different countries in which the PlayStation Network isn’t supported, though we’re still not quite sure for what reason.

      • Donut@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why would Valve delist a game? Can you elaborate on what kind of speculation was made?

        • Kroxx@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          2 months ago

          The idea was that the weekend of the review bombing AH and Sony weren’t communicating a lot/ didn’t have a plan for countries where the game was already sold but could no longer be played.

          So it was speculated that Valve might have pulled sales because they wanted to protect themselves from any legal repercussions, while all the dust settled. At the very least it would look like they tried to do something if it ever went to court.

          It made sense to me but I live in the US. If you break into someones house here and hurt yourself, the homeowner is liable legally even though the criminal was breaking and entering into the homeowners home. The country is so sue happy that many companies are very proactive on legal matters.

          • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Any articles for this speculation or uncertainty? Because that’s also something Valve would be quick to shut down and point to Sony, for legal reasons.

            Or is this all reddit threads from people who don’t understand how steam works?

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, YOU’RE the one claiming speculation. The null statement is “Without a PR statement, we don’t know who delisted the game”. The speculation was “We believe Sony delisted it.” It just means he’s not satisfied by any evidence in place. You don’t demand sources to make someone disprove a speculative.

            • Kroxx@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nope that’s why I used the phrases “the idea was” and “speculated”

    • Stern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had thought Valve might have been pre-emptive owing to the refund requests tbh.