I don’t expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I’m just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned [email protected] from [email protected] earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was ‘trolling about neopronouns’ I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from [email protected] for ‘trolling’. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate [email protected], but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you’re welcome to disagree with.

I don’t view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they’re on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I’m not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don’t have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

  • WrittenInRed [any]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I hate how quick world is to mass downvote, accuse of being a russian troll, or just straight up remove comments from people who express any sort of actual left-wing opinion. Reading through that whole comment thread there was nothing you said that came across as trolling. Its kinda exhausting how many people take any criticism of the democratic party as being support for Trump, or believe voting is the most important and only way to change anything. I get closer to just blocking world entirely every day tbh.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there? They cooperate with one another, so if you cross one you cross both.

    But yeah, doesn’t surprise me. Jordan is the same white dude who said he didn’t support BLM because protests inconvenienced him. He’s a peak liberal Zionist.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I used to think neo-pronouns are kinda silly, and I guess I still kinda do. But there’s no skin off my back to address people in a way that they don’t find hurtful. If people tell me my actions are hurtful to them, I try and take them at face value so long as doing so wouldn’t be hurtful to others or myself. Seems like basic conscientiousness to me.

    PTB. You did nothing wrong here.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My beef with neo pronouns is they are used in such a way to weaponize the “political correctness” attitude of some liberal communities

      Drag is a good example because they’re a blatant troll, and pretty blatantly try to get anyone who disagrees with them about anything banned for being “transphobic”

      Like it’s an obvious bit, it makes the mods and admins look like fools. Drag got banned from hexbear AND .ml for this behavior.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Every other instance should defederate from .world. Neoliberal fascism is no better than regular fascism.

        • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I think we’re talking past each other or something. I was meaning that LemmyWorld is a shitty, reddit style, censorship regime. Not that neolibs getting banned is bad.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The issue they control some key subs, but yeah I think there is enough evidence that mods on key subs are malicious actors that are working against the fedi thesis

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Since when are they neoliberal? I encounter more bleeding heart progressives on that instance than anywhere else. Sorry they don’t pass your purity test but they sure as fuck hate fascists.

      Edit: ohhhh haha, I just checked your instance. Yea no wonder they aren’t leftie enough for you, go home tankie 👋

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I just want to add that it seems to me that about 90% of people accused of trolling on here do not themselves think they are trolling. Something to ponder.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I think this is a related factor but not quite what I’m getting at here.

        My understanding of trolling is that it is a deliberate attempt to trigger negative emotional responses and cause trouble. So users should have a good sense of whether they are or are not engaged in trolling.

        So either:

        A: They are lying about their intentions. B: The community and mods are ascribing ill intentions where there are none. Or C: Different people are using conflicting definitions of trolling.

        While A might seem the obvious answer, I think it’s actually far less common than people think. When I go through the histories of people accused of trolling I rarely see clear evidence of it. It’s usually just a person who has a tendency to respond angrily to people they disagree with, or who has a particularly strong disagreement with the community on a particular issue that they feel passionately about.

        So I usually chock these cases up to B, and I think this case is a pretty clear example. However I’d also be curious to know if C is at play here, so if you think there is another definition of trolling that differs from mine, please share it.

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I’d hope that anyone online enough to become a Lemmy moderator would know better, but plenty of people think trolling means doing absolutely anything anyone might not be entirely happy with online. That definition seems to be the prevailing one on TV and radio news, so people who don’t engage with online culture would pick it up that way. That would cover things like posting a joke which was poorly received, whether it was just terrible or because it was offensive, and whether or not you knew it was potentially offensive.

          There’s also the matter of whether trolling is trying to intentionally provoke people specifically by pretending to be an idiot (and looking at Wikipedia, it’s sometimes as an attempt at humour rather than to provoke - e.g. Ken M isn’t trying to upset anyone, but is pretending to be an idiot or misinformed).

          So there are plenty of definitions of trolling going around, and it’s plausible that moderators might sometimes use one that’s wildly incompatible with your definition.

        • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean, further looking and it’s almost certainly B. I think people like to ascribe ill-intent when they just knee-jerk to disagreement. “Trolling” here was absolutely the wrong choice of verbiage.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I rarely see trolling here tbh maybe dragon fucker but he is so committed to it, whatever

  • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You shouldn’t use your mod account to post political hot-takes. Create another account to do that with unless you think it represents and promotes the community you moderate.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I disagree; This isn’t LinkedIn, where you’re expected to keep a crisp and clean public-facing account. If a mod is a bastard, I’d prefer they at least have the guts to be a bastard publicly instead of hiding behind alts. Show me who is actually moderating communities.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I can take that criticism, I can be quick to throw out a hot take. Though I’m not sure that obfuscation of political leanings of moderators is necessarily a good thing.

      If anything it seems like it would be better for transparency to know who’s potentially censoring speech and what their opinions are, especially when something as simple as like “being trans” gets considered “political” by people.

  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Really unsurprising considering it involved Israel. News mods usually bend over backwards like the r/worldnews to remove anything slightly critical. Especially when it’s calling out hasbara

  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I was the one that submitted the ban, after a number of reports. On the face of it (I am at work, so don’t always have time to deep dive), The reports did seem to align with trolling.

    I had/have no idea what’s going on withe the Jordan Lund thing.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    World is an absolute cancer on Lemmy, its filled with ShitLibs who hold on to their Reddit mentality. If Blahaj defederated from world absolutely nothing of value would be lost.