• TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    ‘minimal abstinence outside of hospital.’”

    I’m not sure why folks seem to think ‘minimal abstinence outside of hospital’ is a smoking gun. That’s pretty much how medical staff should document an alcoholic whose sobriety only began while hospitalized. It means she hasn’t been able to quit drinking!

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In isolation it’s not great, but in conjunction with your own advocate talking about you not following a doctor’s orders? It doesn’t bolster confidence that the individual would follow doctors orders in the future.

      It means she hasn’t been able to quit drinking!

      Yes, that’s exactly the point. It’s quite unlikely her medical troubles started when she was hospitalized.
      A history of not following medical advice casts doubt about a future of following medical advice.

      Yes, addiction is a disease that the individual may lack the ability to control. That doesn’t change that it’s a risk factor for non-compliance that’s absent in others who need the transplant.

      • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        whoa wait a minute. I didn’t realize which comment i was replying to. I read three different articles and found NOTHING stating she relapsed.

        I do similar documentation and I can promise you that “minimal abstinence outside the hospital” does NOT mean relapse.

        I’m gonna have to ask to see the citation or ask you to delete your comment for misinfo