• Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’d pointing out that this mechanism evolved because the plants lived somewhere where the soil didn’t have enough nutrients.

      They’re not native to people’s homes, you know.

      Tomatos also utilise bugs as nutrients indirectly.

      Did you know that the sticky hairs found on the stems of tomato plants are designed to trap small insects? Or that these die and fall to the ground where they are absorbed by the roots of the plant after their decomposition? That is why scientists have recently described the tomato as being a carnivorous plant

      https://laidbackgardener.blog/2016/07/22/tomatoes-are-carnivorous/

      Just like you can definitely survive on IV-nutrients and thus don’t “need” to eat, technically, but I think most people understand why that sentence is a bit questionable.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      That source is awful lmao

      Think of a human being who does not take vitamins. As long as the person eats and drinks, he will stay alive. But without vitamins he will be weak and susceptible to ailments. That person will have a hard time recovering from sickness.

      In reality, Venus flytraps require occasional insects in order to flourish. They’re unable to absorb the nutrients insects provide any other way, because they evolved in nutrient-poor soil and their roots cannot tolerate soil nutrients. Similar systems of insect nutrient absorption have evolved independently many times, e.g. multiple pitcher plants, sundews, and bromeliads