• enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      My issue is honestly the marketing. Calling it “the party jug” pretty much tells everyone exactly what it’s for, and let’s just say it’s probably not for your doctor recommended 1-2 drink daily maximum. Now I’m not a teetotaller or anything, but this is obviously directed at quite a young audience, which I think is a bit problematic.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Calling it “the party jug” pretty much tells everyone exactly what it’s for…

        …sharing with a large group of people?

        this is obviously directed at quite a young audience

        To me it seems aimed at people that want to buy a lot of alcohol for not very much money, which tends to be young people, but they don’t seem to have done anything in particular to target young people.

        1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning. It’s not the size of the container that prevents that. Are these 4 liter jugs less expensive than 1 liter bottles?

        If you want to prevent alcohol deaths you should focus on addressing the causes of alcoholism (I’m not an expert but shooting from the hip: loneliness and hopelessness) and drunk driving (again, not an expert but: transit infrastructure).

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          1 liter of vodka is more than enough to kill a healthy adult by alcohol poisoning.

          Laughs in Finnish

        • Sprawlie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You kind of countered your own comment at the end

          One of the leading causes of alcoholism is cheap access to alcohol

          • m0darn@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’ve done some toggling and found this article abstract.

            and what I have to say is this:

            Touche.

            Key sentence:

            The results also suggested that compared with general price increases, minimum- pricing policies might affect harmful drinkers proportionally more…

            I guess I’d be pleased to see the provincial Alberta government embrace epidemiologically based policy making. Especially if they do it consistently and not just when it aligns with their ideology.

        • enkers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I personally think there should be some hard ethical bounds on marketing when it comes to potentially life wrecking substances. We do this for cigarettes, right?

          Now I think humankind’s relationship with alcohol is a bit more nuanced, but when alcohol packaging starts to look like sugary cereal boxes, that’s where I draw the line. Admittedly this isn’t quite there, but it’s borderline IMO. I don’t think we should be encouraging binge drinking by selling party sized mix packs like this. Mind you, it’s not the size or price that bothers me. My grandma always bought gallon bottles of booze from the US on the cheap, but they’d last her a few years. That’s fine. Sell it without fun-dinosaur, and put on a boring-ass, noname vodka label, and it’s fine by me.

          Just an addendum, I feel similarly about marketing of sugary cereal to children.

      • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t think it’s marketed to young people, I think it’s marketed to severe alcoholics. There are a shocking number of people who will go through this jug in a day or two.

        I agree with the minister’s concerns that it’s too cheap. I recently moved from BC and it seems that bottom shelf hard liquor in general in Alberta is too cheap.

            • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Go the fuck home, moron. Charging more doesn’t slow the problem drinkers down, it just adds to their troubles.

              • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I am home, suck my dick

                I’m not saying just sin tax the shit, it’s too cheap in proportion to other alcohol. The low-income problem drinker who switches from beer to jugs of vodka to save money is going to make their problem much much worse.

                • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Go home. They like shit excuses for logic better on the other side the mountains. Nobody’s switching from beer to vodka by the gallon, they’re already there. 2x2 liters instead of a gallon jug, big fucking difference. Saskatchewan you can buy vodka by the 5 gallon blue water jug.