Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agoRulemessage-squaremessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down10
arrow-up1636arrow-down1message-squareRulePersona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarehenfredemars@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up116·9 months agoImplying human managers are held accountable.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·edit-29 months agoDepends on the level of manager. DM at Walmart? You might as well not even have the title.
minus-squareAggressivelyPassive@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up13·9 months agoThey can be held accountable, they just won’t 99% of the time.
minus-squareI Cast Fist@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoWhy should they, when they can delegate that, amirite?
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·9 months agoOnly when basic grunt scapegoats fail to repel the call for accountability, a management level unit is sacrificed.
Implying human managers are held accountable.
Depends on the level of manager. DM at Walmart? You might as well not even have the title.
They can be held accountable, they just won’t 99% of the time.
Why should they, when they can delegate that, amirite?
Only when basic grunt scapegoats fail to repel the call for accountability, a management level unit is sacrificed.