• Zummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why people say Maths. Math encompasses every single type of Math. Maths is just wrong.

      • Zummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That may be, but Math still encompasses all Math so there’s no need to pluralize it.

        • joby@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          The discipline is “mathematics.” It’s really not unreasonable that in some parts of the world, it got shortened to maths.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the other error present is the incorrect pluralisation. Mathematica means the entire area or domain of knowledge, while mathematics sounds like several lines of thinking, which is weird when we use it as a singular. Maths doesn’t refer to several kinds of math, and that’s confusing.

                  • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    The original Greek “-ikos” was both the feminine singular when refering to “the art” (the whole field), and the neuter plural when refering to “things pertaining to the art”. Latin took just the feminine singular, and most Latin-based languages today still use a singular, including English terms older than 1500 or so, like chemistry rather than chemics, taxonomy v. taxonomics, or arithmetic as opposed to arithmetics‽

                    Later in the Renaissance, people remembered Greek existed, and decided to try and bring back the neuter plural by taking a perfectly good -ic and slapping an s on it. Thus we get the somewhat newer sciences of physics, mathematics, ballistics, demographics, statistics, and so on.

                    The shortening of mathematics to “math” and “maths” was done much later, around 1900, give or take a few decades. Both versions can be found as purely written contractions beforehand, but their use in speech and whether the s was thruncated appears random.

                    Thus, if you must use a plural, the original useage has singular for the field (“Biomechanics is a difficult subject.”), and plural for things relating to the field (“The mathematics used are difficult to parse.”); don’t try to justify using several thousand year old grammar (from a region remote enough that we forgot about it for several centuries) with syntax rules not present in the original. English is plenty fucked up as it is, let it build it’s own syntax and heal a bit, eh?

      • Zummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, but the British also shortened television and made it tele. That makes sense because they took part of the word to do it. If you were going to shorten the word mathematics, why wouldn’t it be math, especially when that would follow what you did with television. Why shorten the word and then add the s from the end for no reason?

        • firewyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Television isn’t a plural word tho? And if they were talking about more than one television I feel like they would absolutely say teles (tellies?), altho not British so 🤷‍♂️