luckily this is just a 32; i had a 70 from the same brand with the same INSANELY FUCKING STUPID STAND DESIGN that i had to find something for…literally at the most extreme edges of the thing, what the fuck is this? this is so fucking stupid, it cannot be meaningfully cheaper than a proper design and it looks fucking dumb as hell and surely this has pissed off 90% of people that wanted a TV and want to put it on a little stand like a normal fucking person right??

  • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Everyone’s talking about it being stable, but what’s the benefit in stability from having the legs a couple of inches off the end compared to having them halfway from the center to the end?

    I don’t think it would be worse in any way and it would allow the TV’s to stand on smaller surfaces

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s when you one day accidentally bump the table hard and the TV falls on its face. That’s why they are wide—to prevent that.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s more stable, you with your feet close to each other or you with your feet far apart?

      • DudeDudenson@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Me with my feet closer to my elbows rather than me with my feet closer to my hands (thinking of T pose)