Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoKick tankies out of 196lemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square96fedilinkarrow-up175arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up175arrow-down1imageKick tankies out of 196lemmy.blahaj.zoneCassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square96fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKnightfox@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoWhat are you trying to say? Legit question, not sarcasm, just confusion.
minus-squaresharebear@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThey said “how about we work on that and not build artificial walls to those to the left of us.” MLs and other similar ideologies are not to the left of anarchists.
minus-squareKnightfox@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoMLs? I tried googling it, but the closest approximation is Marxist-Leninists?
minus-squareorrk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoyes, that is correct, and ironically fascist (who would have seen that coming, a single party dictatorship with economic control ending as fascist)
What are you trying to say? Legit question, not sarcasm, just confusion.
They said “how about we work on that and not build artificial walls to those to the left of us.”
MLs and other similar ideologies are not to the left of anarchists.
MLs? I tried googling it, but the closest approximation is Marxist-Leninists?
yes, that is correct, and ironically fascist (who would have seen that coming, a single party dictatorship with economic control ending as fascist)