Instead, hurt them where it counts: IP.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    As soon as I heard “retaliatory tariffs” I was like Jesus fuck why? Can we maybe think for longer than three seconds about this in terms of effecting the working class citizens of Canada? Retaliate in ways that hurt American citizens and benefit us. Destabilize the country instead of just making both worse.

    • potate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The classic example is a tarrif on something like Kentucky bourbon. It is targeted at a state that Trump cares about (in theory), is on something discretionary, and there’s tons of Canadian distilleries making broadly comparable products.

      Personally, I’m on a Manhattan kick and am exploring the Rye Whiskey scene.

    • DrinkMonkey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The tariffs are being explicitly selected to avoid harm to Canadian consumers (e.g. on items for which there are available and suitably priced alternatives) and on items which create the most effective political pressure.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Cool, I hope you’re right. But I suspect without regulation that the cost of things will go up and loblaws will use the tariffs as an excuse anyway