• exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Or maybe read the article?

    Occasional alcohol use won’t put you in this situation (hopefully you’ll never be in this situation for any reason)

    However, of the reason you need a liver is that you wrecked your own with booze; you are unlikely to get another one

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same for all the people who eat nuts and get hospitalized as well, pull the plug right? I mean come on, they are lesser humans as we stand on our pedistals and look down on them. /S

      Genetics play a huge role in liver diseases. 85% of liver replacements don’t come from alcohol. Alcohol in sure is bad for you, but it really is a high horse scenario.

      • sazey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Any source on your assertion of 85% of liver transplants not being due to alcohol? May it be because people with livers blown due to alcohol use would be at the bottom of any transplant list?

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I originally was reading studies performed in Australia that the U.S. pitched money to help the studies be larger, they took place around 2012, but here is more information from 2020 where you can see that it say “An estimated 10% to 15% of heavy drinkers progress to cirrhosis after decades of heavy alcohol use.”

          Now cirrhosis isn’t the only liver impact that can come from drinking, but my point was that a lot of our “trashing their livers” view is likely because we look down our nose at drunks. Sure they added to it but we aren’t refusing heart transplants to 30 year olds because they drank Pepsi, when we know just as well added sugars/corn syrup does nothing but “trash their hearts.”

          https://news.va.gov/82545/genetic-risk-alcohol-related-cirrhosis-uncovered/

          I’ll have to find the Australian government article about the 15% being replaced later. I don’t keep search history, auto-deletes

          • sazey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Nah you’re good mate, I take your point. ‘Only’ 10-15% of problem drinkers go on to develop cirrhosis and not a hundred percent of them will go on to trash their livers. You also make a good point about heart transplants not being denied to the obese for example. Today I learnt.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I didn’t see in the article if she self-reported alcohol use, or was tested. I’m responding to the comments here about self-reporting.

      • exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        She had been an alcoholic since teen years and repeatedly tried and failed to quit

        To clarify, I am NOT saying she deserved no healthcare. But donor livers (any organs actually) are a really really scarce commodity. This is why she would not get one

        If we had artificial livers (for example), of course she should have received one

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Omg, again this is like the third time it was posted

            The boyfriend cannot give a full liver because he would die. Living donors can only donate a part of the liver. Unfortunately her liver was too far gone and she required a full cadaveric transplant.

            Basically the docs saved the boyfriend from losing 1/3 of his liver for nothing