• YourPrivatHater@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Why? Nobody needs high definition from a server. Vega is literally unbreakable, super reliable and cost efficient. Display port would be a absolute waste just like HDMI. Same with most hardware applications that don’t need high definition displays. The server ports are literally only used to set up the server.

        This isn’t just a royalties issue, its a issue of necessity.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          VGA is flaky and prone to issues. It doesn’t have a way of reliability relaying information such as display metadata.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Everything in the world is hdmi or DisplayPort. VGA is essentially now a specialty connector used only in data centers.

          HDMI has their fees, but DisplayPort doesn’t. Plus at this point implementing analog to digital converters is probably more expensive than just putting DP on it.

        • Starbuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          IDK man, it would be great if my crash cart or KVM only needed one cable. I can’t wait for USB-C on servers to be everywhere

            • lud@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              There is really no reason not too though. Displayport also takes up less space that would be used for cooling or whatever.

              The only reason other than compatibility is probably that the screws are nice to have if you hook it up to something permanently like a KVM. Displayport have latches but imo they suck and I usually buy cables without them.