• mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        If “accused” means “charged” then absolutely not. Local police have, as they generally do, charged protestors with some selected kinds of nonsense whether technically-valid or not, in addition to just roughing them up and arresting them and then admitting they didn’t do anything wrong and letting them go.

        The federal government has bought into a certain amount of the propaganda and said some ignorant shit, and hasn’t been doing much to discourage the police from doing that, but as far as I’m aware, “antisemitism” in the current propaganda construction is still perfectly legal and likely to remain so (whatever non-binding resolutions congress wants to make about it.)

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            The Tucker Carlson thing only works when you can Just Ask Questions in a place where people can’t ackshually provide the answer.

            • applepie@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              Trucker? Why is u looping in pootin’s lapdog here?

              While my statement was hyperbolic, your additional context doesn’t make it look any better but I do appreciate the input so people can see for themselves :)

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I can accuse you of all sorts of things, like being “anti-semiticist.” That doesn’t mean much. If you don’t see the distinction between that and being charged with an actual crime then there isn’t much I can do to help you here.