Queer people are getting their rights violated and removed in real time, and now we have ppl from all across the political spectrum arguing over a flag I have never seen before.

At this point, I’m convinced that the flag is an intentional psyop designed to sow division in the community over colours on a rectangle to distract from actual issues.

    • midnight@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think a more direct comparison would be flying the US flag with a state flag covering half of it.

      Personal identity flags are perfectly fine, alongside the rainbow pride flag or just on their own. Just don’t cover over the “everyone” flag with specific identities. That’s like the opposite of the flag’s meaning.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          You mean the flag that excludes 1/4 of the membership of the union? Combining specific symbols to try and make groups feel included only ever ends up making another group feel excluded. No one is arguing against symbols for trans people, or intersex, or POC people, just that the standard Rainbow flag was intended to represent them all.

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        They represent a part of the USA, not try to expand the country’s flag by adding more stuff.

        Remember when they kept adding stars to the USA’s national flag every time a new state joined the union?

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Country flags are anti-humanity because the UN flag is already all inclusive…

      (actually, that one might be true, with all the warmongering populist nationalisms and whatnot)