And if they had just brought the kid’s mother, or gone back for her and the other slaves, he never would have had to go rescue her and kill all those sand people, leading to his fall.
Since the Jedi had fucked up “codes” to live by, I never would have expected them to rescue the mom.
Queen Amidala, however…
How fucked up is it that she was taken in by Anakin’s mother, who (as a god damn slave) fed her, gave her a place to stay, allowed her son to risk his life in a pod race, and ultimately gave her only son up willingly to go with her and the two Jedi, not really knowing what would happen but just trusting he’d be safe—but then, that same kid who gets attacked on the way to the ship just leaving Tattooine, ends up flying a fighter craft and destroying the droid control ship which saves Amidala’s entire planet and people. The fact the kid survived any of that is a miracle, but he clearly misses his mother. A fact Amidala was blatantly aware of.
The fact that Amidala, who had nearly infinite resources at her disposal, owed her life and every life she was responsible for in Naboo to Anakin, and was clearly aware of pretty much the only thing Anakin wanted in the entire universe—his god damn mother—and yet Amidala didn’t do jack fucking shit to drop a few coins on Watto and free Shmi.
I never would have expected the Jedi to free her, but Amidala? What a fucking piece of work…
Yeah, but mother-in-law.
“oh god I hope that little slave boy blows me out”
Ah, that had me laughing:D
First time you’ve come across an SW plot hole?
There are just so many wtf did George do this questions where the only answer is “so the movie can happen.” It’s lazy writing which most people overlook bc the movies are fun spectacles.
Overall the movies are made to sell billions of dollars worth of toys and lunch boxes to a new generation, so they’re not particularly worried about writing high quality plot lines.
He would still have been attached to her and in the film’s logic, that was the problem. You can bet that there would have been a point where he would have been afraid for her leading to yadda yadda.
I always found that strange… The jedi were supposed to be the “good guys,” yet their entire thing was “you are not allowed to love or care about anyone or anything ever again.”
Seems kind of fucked up.
Edit: figured I would just put it in an edit rather than respond to each “it’s based on Buddhism” reply: yes, I understand that. But I don’t see Buddhism as something that is inherently “good” or “evil.” And I think most Buddhists would agree with that given the nature of the philosophy.
On the other hand, in the Star Wars canon, the Jedi are very explicitly “good” in a universe that doesn’t leave much room between black and white for any grey.
Maybe it gets murkier if you wade into the EU, but if I’m being honest, I don’t enjoy the series to care enough about any of that stuff. Most of which seems “retconned” in (there’s prob a better term for it) long after the original three film trilogy story wrapped up (and maybe the prequels, if A New Hope actually was planned as Episode IV from day one which I don’t think it was) later on to make the universe seem more complex than what was presented in the first three movies.
I don’t know a better way to describe it, but that stuff always just seemed like clever sci-fi authors who aren’t George Lucas trying their damnedest to flesh out a kind of boring (sorry everyone don’t hate me, but it kind of is when you get down to it), one dimensional, kitschy, soft sci-fi setting. I just have zero interest in any of it.
Just my opinion of course.
Ya should check out The Unifying Force Theory, basically says the Force has no inherent light or dark side, that it’s indifferent. The Force, through individual’s actions dictate whether they are light or dark, and within ourselves is the capacity for both. It’s kinda what the Sequel Trilogy was trying to go for with Kylo and Rey, albeit executed very poorly.
Funny enough, probably the most famous practitioner of this belief was Qui-Gon Jinn. It’s also why he never was elevated over the rank of Knight. He was considered unorthodox and a bit of a rebel by most Jedi then, who followed the more commonly held belief of The Living Force Theory.
I had heard the dark side was a twisted corruption of the force and sort of like a cancer
Yeah that’s The Living Force Theory, that the Force is inherently good and the Dark Side is a perversion of the Force.
Ya should check out The Unifying Force Theory, basically says…
I mean I’m glad this kind of stuff exists, and I’m never going to rag on someone for being passionate about a thing they like, but yeah I’d rather not spend time and energy learning about a fictional theory about a fictional (mystical) power that only exists in the universe of a kitschy 70s soft sci-fi series.
I think it’s to prevent you from being coerced to do something you shouldn’t by threats to loved ones. If you are unattached you can’t be blackmailed.
The views of the Jedi were written from one interpretation of Buddhism’s views on attachment, in that attachments inevitably lead to suffering. Though that’s probably more a mistranslation and I think it’s more “dependence” instead of attachment: it’s ok to have relationships and to love and care about other people, it’s just when your happiness or well-being is dependent on others or on some thing that suffering is the result. Though that’s just one view, and there are of course many, many interpretations.
The idea also exist in Catholicism that you can’t fully devote yourself to the way if you have too much attachment, hence monks and nuns isolating themselves and priests not allowed to marry.
It’s supposed to be the same concept that Buddhist monks follow, or any monks for that matter. Desire leads to temptation, and temptation leads to corruption, so they swear off all worldly comforts and attachments.
Right, but I don’t see that as being inherently “good,” or “evil.” Whereas the Jedi are very explicitly the “good guys” in a universe that does not leave much room for grey.
Lying, deception, and selfishness are tools of the Sith, which are universally considered evil.
Ok? Seems as though you missed the point completely. I wasn’t talking about the Sith, at least they seem honest about their powers.
So is the implication that the Jedi have to be “good” regardless of the fucked up things they make their adherents do, simply because the Sith are “bad”? Is that really how simple and black and white this shitty universe is? Bad guy exist, therefore the their enemies must be the pure and holy good guy. And as we all know, there is no room for grey in Star Wars. Just like real life 🙄.
Jedi are universally portrayed as lawful good and are basically just the complete “good guy” archetype. Yet their actual beliefs and practices are pretty fucking "evil "in many cases.
That’s why Revan rejected both, declared they were both extremists, started The Grey Jedi, and became enemy #1 of both The Jedi and The Sith.
And the negations failed. And the blockade already in place. And way too late. And the princess almost killed. And a sith encounter.
This has to be one of the worst diplomatic missions ever :D
But you have heard of me. Wait, shit, fucked it up
Fuck you for putting the concept of a Jack Sparrow Jedi in my head
Edit:because it’s amazing and now I want it, but it will never occur
“The Jedi feel it’s unnatural, savvy?”
That would be Space Pirate Hondo Onaka
“Worst diplomatic mission so far!”
Where’s everyone thinks the rest of the younglings came from?
They take them as infants.
Government sanctioned. You know. For the greater good.
The real reason the Jedi rarely take strays that can talk in; is because the mind of a toddler is easily molded through the force.
Yup.
Nope. If we follow the lore as intended, the order switched to toddlers after a bloody civil war left a dude in charge that decided attachments are the source of all evil and training in the force should begin before any form of attachment is allowed to take root.
That’s just, like, propaganda.
I mean. Think about it. The Force’s very nuture is connecting all living things, right? The Force is attachment.
“Attachment” is not the same as connection. The concept the Jedi are talking about is the Buddhist idea of attachment. It’s possessiveness, codependency, fear of loss. One cannot be fully connected to anything they’re attached to.
You’ve been misled by the Sith propaganda my friend.
Yea this always seemed like a major plot hole to me. How are the Jedi good if their entire ethos is about isolating yourself from everyone and everything you’ve ever loved or had a connection to?
Read about Buddhism, it’s basically that.
I’m familiar with Buddhism. I also don’t see it as inherently “good,” it just “is.” Which I think most Buddhists would agree with.
On the other hand, the Jedi are explicitly the “good guys” in a very black and white universe.
And it’s very possessive. Yandere type.
The greater good.
SHUT IT!
Based qui gon using the force to bet on the races lmao
Slave kid…not so much…but this kid is so legit broda you won’t believe it when you meet him. Biggest midochlorians I’ve ever seen
“Well would you look at that. Somebody threw away a perfectly good white boy.”
I want my two Dollars!
Trust me, guys, this kid’s got the juice!
Just another day with Qui-Gon. Where do you think Larry learned it from?
Obi was getting a bit to old for priest Qui-Gon.
STOP
Or at least link the Chappelle Show sketch
Why isn’t Qui-Gon in the picture?
