• Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve heard blur is not destructive. Please use a paintbrush on 100% opacity if you do this

    • holomorphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Depends on the kind of blur. Some kinds can indeed be almost perfectly removed if you know the used blurring function, others are destructive. But, yes, don’t take that chance. Always delete/paint over sensitive information.

      Source: we had to do just that in a course I took a long time ago.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ah man, I remember when they caught some pedo creep who used a non-destructive blur on the CSAM materials he produced with his face. So satisfying.

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I prefer sampling the surroundings, typing out a different number or text over it, then blurring with a non destructive effect.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        wouldn’t you also need to know in what kind of pattern the blur was applied. I am sure if you do it multiple times starting from multiple non identical partitioning of the region, it will be impossible.