FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agoPerspective rulemessage-squaremessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1817arrow-down10
arrow-up1817arrow-down1message-squarePerspective ruleFakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squarewellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoWouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them. I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
minus-squareDuranie@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·10 months agoLet’s reframe this a moment - Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?” Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all” Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
minus-squarewellee@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoInteresting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months ago Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.
Wouldn’t that make more sense? Eagles wouldn’t talk to mice, they’d eat them.
I think a songbird would have made sense since they share bird feeders with the mice lol
Let’s reframe this a moment -
Wealthy person 1 “you ever go hungry?”
Wealthy person 2 “no, not at all”
Wealthy person 1 “I have no idea what that poor person was complaining about.”
Interesting interpretation, Nathan Pyle doesn’t usually do political comics though. I think this one is just supposed to be fun.
For good reason lol. But still, not sure how someone could make this and not see something more in it.