nifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agoThe first reason should be enoughmessage-squaremessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1530arrow-down111
arrow-up1519arrow-down1message-squareThe first reason should be enoughnifty@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squaremogoh@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoI don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
minus-squarevithigar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoFirst edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e. While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.
I don’t know. I played 3.5 and 5e and I like the 5e rules way more than 3.5. Isn’t PF very close to 3.5?
First edition Pathfinder was very close to 3.5. Many people called it 3.75e.
While some of the D&D bones are still there, Second edition Pathfinder is very much its own thing.