• lunatic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, much as I’d like Sisko to come back in anything regarding DS9, that Brooks doesn’t want to do it is actually convenient for the story: Sisko’s in the Celestial Temple with the Prophets, let him stay there. LD has shown we can have a great DS9 episode without him.

        It’s a shame he’s not interested, but there are plenty of BIPOC actors who’d love to have a chance at being in Trek.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, you could definitely do a DS9 reunion like the TNG reunion on Picard without Sisko (and Nog, unfortunately)… but would people really want to see that?

        • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I can definitely buy Sisko as a king under the mountain figure, believed by the Bajorans to return in their hour of greatest need, like Arthur for the British.

      • Nakedmole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think I watched that one. Is it the one where he seems a little weird and plays the piano? Do you remember if he gave a reason to not want to do more DS9?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t remember, no. But yes, that’s the documentary. They also come up with a hypothetical first episode of a series taking place 20 years later.