• Player2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Efficiency. Combustion engines have a shockingly narrow acceptable power to fuel consumption zone

      • mythosync@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Efficiency, yes. The second part is a little misguided though. The different gears in a transmission allow the vehicle to move at your desired speed while keeping the engine’s speed low, thus reducing fuel consumption.

        Power to fuel consumption isn’t really a thing afaik. Naturally, a slower spinning engine will use less fuel.

        • Player2@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sorry for unclear wording, I meant that you obviously need some level of power output to move, but you need different levels of power output to keep moving at any given speed, hence the gears. What I meant by ‘power to fuel consumption’ was that while you theoretically could go at a high speed using a low gear up to a point, that would be very inefficient. I’m not actually an engineer, though I pretend to be one at university.

          Good thing I’m not an educator!