• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes I agree with all of that. Person A would be an accessory to murder.

    Being an accessory to murder is a different thing than being a murderer. That’s why they have different labels. I think you view them as the same? Or are suggesting they are?

    • pulsereaction@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the example in question maybe, maybe not. If Omar wasn’t handed the gun from person A, he could have gotten the gun in some other way.

      However, in an election, no one gets elected without votes, so yes I do consider everyone who votes for a bigot to be responsible for what that bigot did.