So they adopted a baby, because the real parent couldn’t care for her, had a stable legal job in Britain, and now the baby lives in foster care, and the parents are in prison and then deported.
The reason for the foster care is stated in the article:
“But a social worker from the Children and Family Court Advisory Service CAFCASS said she believed Lucy had been neglected, underfed and under stimulated.”
So they adopted a baby, because the real parent couldn’t care for her, had a stable legal job in Britain, and now the baby lives in foster care, and the parents are in prison and then deported.
Great Job of the Border Officers! Well done lads.
The reason for the foster care is stated in the article:
“But a social worker from the Children and Family Court Advisory Service CAFCASS said she believed Lucy had been neglected, underfed and under stimulated.”
The Reason is that they are imprisoned.
Also Social Worker has no qualifications for making such statementents
They should have asked a psychiatrist or a paediatrician to assess this
What makes you think they didn’t?
The fact that they quote testimony from a social worker and not from a qualified person?
This is what social workers do. What makes you think they’re unqualified?
Since when is it the job of a social worker or part of their studies to perform medical assessments of children?