FYI @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] and a few others
A rage bait post they just restored: https://lemmy.world/post/24282976. The initial removal was about rule 3 - no rage baiting. That rule has been removed.
Another rage bait comment against vegans: https://lemmy.world/comment/14535452
Don’t go to communities…
So many people be don’t understand people use all. This comm just seems like a reactionary neat centred sub with shit recipe videos and shilling what seems misinformation for meat centred diets. I downvote vegan sub more often and they don’t comb through and ban people for it. Though I’ve downvoted their post less than this carnivore sub recently because at least theirs seems to be focused and decent content.
I think people should put more effort into their subs rather than vote fixing under the guise of banning “drive by downvoters”.
Lemmy seems to have a real hard on for trying to dictate how the downvotes get used. Meanwhile users are creating community to use for their own personal blogs as opposed to, you know, a blog.
If this is power tripping, then shouldn’t meat lovers be justified in brigading vegan communities to blanket downvote posts?
Yes, they would be, see:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/27711002
The consensus is that you should not ban people for downvoting. At the time, vegan posts in that community would be massively downvoted vs upvoted so beaver used some sort of automation to ban everyone who downvoted. That was considered power tripping so beaver was removed and everyone was unbanned. I was thinking that maybe beaver took it too far after reading the comments in the thread I linked. But now I’m unsure, since the consensus has shifted and it is ok to ban people for downvoting when it comes to this carnivore community. Idk.
I found I kept downvoting and getting disgusted by these carnivore communities since they kept showing up in my feed, so I blocked them. Votes don’t matter as much in lemmy as they did in reddit, but they are public which has always given me the ick.
Well, votes not mattering isn’t totally correct, as some communities use the tool that auto-bans anyone who gets enough downvotes over the last month, so you can use brigading to get those people banned from communities they might visit.
Yeah I forgot, I remember someone talking about Pleasant Politics doing this. I don’t think votes should be used like that but it is not up to me.
Yeah, I think it’s a not-well thought out idea. All it would take is a group of several people, or one person with several alts, and you could send most people into the red on updoots and get them banned.
Wonder if the tool can ban mods? If so, you could dethrone the mods of Pleasant Politics long enough to cause some serious chaos before the admins got on and fixed the problem. It seems like a potential security vulnerability, to be honest.
TIL.
I’m actually surprised that it’s possible to ban people for blanket downvoting, e.g. I don’t think mods of reddit communities would be able to do that.
Votes are public on lemmy, unlike reddit.
Where do I find those?
Yeah the carnivore communities suck 🤮 They kept popping in my /all feed so I blocked them. The rage bait post is particularly nauseating to me. They don’t see animals as having the same sentience as vegans view they have, it is incredibly disheartening. These communities are going to be controversial, you either think it is wrong to abuse/rape/kill an animal for consumption or you don’t.
That’s why the vegan instances are great, you won’t see this shit ever. You’re free to talk about veganism without someone coming in to troll. The carnivore diet is just a diet, one that is harmful IMO, but veganism is so much more than a plant based diet. I still come across comments making fun of instances that require content warnings for meat, dairy, and eggs. They just don’t get it and I’m tired of trying to reason with unreasonable people.
I don’t expect .world to do anything about them. I’m actually surprised people seem to be on the mod’s side here, they certainly weren’t when beaver banned people for downvoting.
you either think it is wrong to abuse/rape
everyone opposes this
I think this can be a place to post the most daft stuff vegans say, ideally with links.
I will start with
“Cows, pigs, sheeps, etc. are raped (no consent) and sexually assaulted (against their will) for dairy, meat, wool…”
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/15551150
🤣🤣🤣
No they don’t, even the linked thread had Felix (who was the mod of the carnivore community linked) making fun of vegans for being against this. You think Felix is an isolated incident? Because they are not, I’ve heard the same sentiments expressed by many people both online and IRL. If everyone supposedly opposes this, then why haven’t animal agriculture practices changed?
In that thread, someone else said:
That’s okay. There are many people who only know their food as a bite-sized anonymous mass from the supermarket. who think that cows just give milk all the time. They don’t know how piglets are bred. That you can walk into any barn and see unfathomable suffering in every corner. Who have never heard of forceful impregnation, confinement crates, premature separation, tail docking, mulesing, torture breeding, teeth clipping, CO2 chambers, castration, steroid growth, veal crates, tethering, weaning rings, induced moulting, sheep dipping… and we haven’t even started on the illegal cruelties.
In this state of blissful ignorance, you might regard someone who associates eating a steak with rape as crazy.
I used to be like this too. And to be honest, there are times when I wish I could return to it and just dismiss vegans with a downvote as exaggerating and annoying.
Surely if everyone thought that abusing animals was wrong, all the companies selling animal products that resulted from said abuse would be gone. But people don’t actually care and just buy whatever from the store, directly supporting the abuse. People may “oppose” it theoretically but in practice don’t. Even the US government “solved” the problem by making it a crime to film what is actually happening in those places (ag-gag laws) since businesses were losing profit when their cruel practices were exposed.
But I know I am wasting my time with you in particular, you spout nonstop carnist apologia. You insist there is 0 suffering during animal agriculture and that veganism doesn’t help animals - not even in a supply and demand way. There isn’t a way to actually talk to you about this or veganism in general because we will go around in circles accomplishing nothing. I am vegan, you are incredibly carnist. So, please disengage so I can move on with my day.
please disengage so I can move on with my day.
Lemmy supports blocking users
Note to both @[email protected] and @[email protected] for the future. 1. Respect people asking you to
disengagein this instance. Just stop replying. Likewise if you want someone todisengage, don’t also write a wall of text to which they might feel they need to reply. Just reply withdisengage.Finally, this is an official warning that this discussion seems to have run its course and is devolving into a flamewar. I can’t just lock one thread, so please just stop replying to each other or I’ll have to issue a 1-day ban.
Respect people asking you to disengage in this instance. Just stop replying. Likewise if you want someone to disengage, don’t also write a wall of text to which they might feel they need to reply. Just reply with disengage.
if this is an instance-wide rule, it should be stated in the main sidebar. it’s not a deal breaker for me, but I strongly feel people should be encouraged to use the block feature, rather than getting the power to decide who is allowed to participate in a discussion.
Ye I should probably add smt. Just a lot to do.
The point of the disengage is that sometimes you might not necessarily want to block a person. Blocking still allows them to talk shit about you without you seeing it for example. The disengage is a way to say “ok, let’s agree to disagree before things get (more) flamey” in a succinct and official manner. You don’t always want to block everyone you get into a heated argument with, so there’s good to have a way to disengage where neither party feels like they have to have the final word.
I hope lemmy at some point would give us a way to lock individual comment threads.
Disengage should only be enforceable if it’s invoked in good faith. Posting a wall of text and using it to get the last word forfeits any protection it provides. It’s the equivalent of calling for a fair catch in American football, then attempting a return.
Immediate edit: it doesn’t even have to be a wall of text. Any response included with the disengage request invites further discussion and suggests that there is a desire to continue the conversation, at least to the extent of having the final say.
I am already aware, thanks for the reminder :) When someone says to disengage, it means they want to stop the conversation because it is not worth any more of their time.
I think animals are tortured in the industry, you do not, I think people not buying meat can cause a change, you do not. What more is there to say? Nothing. So kindly, please disengage and stop messaging me 3 times at once, 1 message is fine.
don’t tell me what to do.
veganism doesn’t help animals - not even in a supply and demand way
supply and demand is a theory about price discovery. it has nothing to do w with whether buying beans helps animals… which it doesn’t.
You insist there is 0 suffering during animal agriculture
I never did that
@[email protected] , @[email protected] , @[email protected] could any of you have a look at the votes on this post?
Another comment getting instantly 5 upvotes, and my post and comment getting 3 to 5 upvotes at a low traffic time seems suspicious
Apparently someone created an account just to comment on this thread in defense of the mods 👀
Hm… I’m not sure it is worth bothering too much about, honestly. That said:
There is a little bit of a suspicious pattern. Three different accounts, all active during the same short span of time (space of 6 minutes) during a quiet time, all giving one downvote to the post, and then a couple downvotes and upvotes in the comments boosting a particular point of view in slightly different ways.
One of the suspicious voters seems to be to be clearly a bad-faith political propaganda account, which is interesting. I have a theory that some of the political propagandists like to incite pointless drama related to specific mods, or specific hot-button issues like veganism, just to add noise and unpleasantness to the system, and give a vehicle if they want to attack some particular user or get them riled up to motivate moderator action against them.
Just a little bit of correlation doesn’t necessarily mean anything, of course. Sometimes random data contains stuff that looks like patterns but isn’t. On the other hand, two of those accounts are on the same instance, which means it’s easy to send a DM to one of the admins pointing it out so that they can check to see if they’re coming from the same IP or other indications that they’re the same person doing voter fraud.
Do you think it’s worth bothering? A small amount of voting fraud is kind of the nature of the beast, and it’s hard to be sure about this kind of thing.
Sucks to get down votes not relating to the community, doesn’t it?
Not really, just curious. This community is pretty closely followed, so I’m sure people are going to have a look anyway.
By the way, what do you think about the removal of the “no rage bait” rule?
I think it’s their community, they get to add or remove rules at will. The same applies to any vegan or other community. Nobody is obligated to give you advanced warning of rule changes, you’re just trying to drum up drama over nothing.
Since you wont respond to DMs
You have 3 times now, indirectly called for a community I’ve been running to be removed (plus a bonus time after I left the mod team of a community). I’ve tried to discuss with you in DMs, but you don’t respond.
I think the recent politicking you have demonstrated shows we are no longer working collaboratively toward a lemmy for a diversity of viewpoints and communities.
You don’t owe me a response, but we have been collaborators in community building, so I would have liked the curtesy of some response to DMs.
Since our professional relationship has broken down, I can’t collaborate with you on [email protected] any more. I’ve transferred the community to your BoozeOrWater alt and left the mod team. You worked really hard in promoting that community, and by all rights it should be yours.
You have 3 times now, indirectly called for a community I’ve been running to be removed (plus a bonus time after I left the mod team of a community).
Can you explain a little more about this? Nothing I’ve seen under this post has been calling for a community to be removed, just explaining a particular moderator action that he disagrees with.
None of it is overt, but I’ve played politicks long enough to know when I’m being systematically undermined.
0
12 days ago: https://hackertalks.com/post/5695193/6088825 Whataboutism brought up over and over about the previous vegan drama when discussing the carnivore drama.
1
9 days ago : https://hackertalks.com/post/5728508/6124480
Seems fine on the surface, “Hey what if it can be proven unhealthy”,
Then poking people to prove its unhealthy https://hackertalks.com/post/5728508/6160432
2
3 days ago:
Copy pasting sunshines screed into the New Moderator message in [email protected] https://lemm.ee/post/52635163/17504025
Why? To resolve the Lemmy.world TOS health concerns (note he hasn’t done this to the vegan community). He did move it into a new post when requested, at this point he was not responding to DMs (or rather selective in responding to anything except about my questions of his questioning my community at every stage.
So in the post blaze made repeating sunshines screed https://lemm.ee/post/52660382 , I respond, but I think at this point sunshine had me blocked so they didn’t read or respond, so blaze pokes them. https://lemm.ee/post/52660382/17528261 (really trying to get a fight going I think)
3
This PTB thread about carnivore as well. (This is the bonus event, now that I’m no longer a moderator of that community)
During this I was DMing them saying I was feeling attacked that they kept trying to make a fight happen between the vegan community and the carnivore (basically only me) community over health concerns, and I didn’t get a response.
It’s clear they don’t agree with my niche community, that’s fine. Calling attention and creating situations where a new community has to justify itself isn’t great. Using a new community as a foil for some understated motive isn’t great (if that was the scenario).
As a individual lemmy user all of this is fine, but as someone I was collaborating with on a different community that isn’t good for me.
Since communication had broken down, and event 3 happened today, I thought it was best for me to untangle myself from the previous commitment.
As far as the actual zero carb carnivore people go, there are about 2 or 3 of us on lemmy that post and comment. Thats a huge amount of responsibility for a few shoulders, getting involved in other peoples agendas isn’t something I have the stomach for.
I think you’re very much overreacting here. Someone who says, truthfully, that you did thing X and they don’t agree with it doesn’t mean they are “systematically undermining” you. It definitely doesn’t mean that they’re calling for your community to be removed, even if some totally different person might come to a totally different conclusion that the true thing that you actually did might imply that as a possible remedy.
Personally, I see absolutely no reason why “I didn’t agree with the mod when they did thing X” would imply that the community should be removed. Has any community ever been removed, or anyone ever suggested it, based on any post here which are basically all the same type of “systematic undermining” of some mod activity?
You might be totally right.
My core issue is the communication stopped. I can’t co-run a community when the communication has stopped.
Hello @[email protected],
Do you know when the announcement will be made about the new “respectful dissent” policy? This seems to fall under this scope
For people tired of this topic, feel free to hide the post, except if you’re on Lemmy.world which is still running on 0.19.3 (that feature was introduced later)
Yeah no your war on this community is pointless. They are allowed to exist just like you and if you don’t like it you can hide them and move on.
Well, this is one where the subject is kinda beat to death.
Blanket down voting is a shitty thing, and it is completely appropriate for mods to ban people that do it
However, they should have a definitive criteria for what thresholds they use to determine what is and isn’t blanket down voting.
Myself, I down vote stuff on there that’s either off topic for the place, or stuff that’s utter bullshit, and/or stuff that’s YouTube drek because the YouTube drek is never sourced well. A link to a video is way too likely to be bullshit when it comes down to fad, niche, or weird diets.
Which means I end up down voting more than I do otherwise.
And, there’s very rarely any posts worth engaging in.
By the apparent metrics, I should have already been banned. Which means that the apparent metrics don’t match what’s being used in practice.
However! I think that’s less PTB and more “clueless” mods that don’t have experience running a controversial community. The more controversial the subject is, the clearer you have to be with how, when, and why you’re going to take action, unless you want to end up on a community like this one, lol.
Gonna have to say YDI here sorry. Blanket downvoting is a bannable offense in any community because it denegrates the platform as a whole.
I also want to apologize to the carnivore community for my previous assumptions about the diet as a whole. I had unquestioningly believed a post that labeled the diet as unconditionally dangerous, and I commented encouraging people who had that opinion to report the community. After doing more research, I realize I was mistaken.
While there are risks associated with the carnivore diet, and it certainly shouldn’t be marketed as “for everyone,” when approached mindfully and appropriately, the diet is not necessarily dangerous.
Gonna have to say YDI here sorry. Blanket downvoting is a bannable offense in any community because it denegrates the platform as a whole.
Ironically, I’m not even banned myself, as I participated (and generally don’t downvote that much anyway, whatever the community)
What isn’t really clear here is that users seems to have been banned for one single downvote? Seems a bit extreme.
Nope.
Only users not participating and either blanket downvoting multiple posts or downvoting specifically this ONE moderator’s post banning downvoting without participation were banned.
You are actually the best example here - you have participated and are not banned.
Coming to the community just to downvote is toxic. Since banned users don’t contribute, they have no interest being there.
You don’t like a certain community - block and move on with your life. Don’t behave like a dick.
Yeah, don’t go to communities you dislike and downvote everything. It’s a dick move. Just block them.
The initial removal was about rule 3 - no rage baiting. That rule has been removed.
Well, that explains why the posts were restored? Mods are allowed to change rules, right?
Coming to the community, especially a small one, just to downvote without posting a single post/comment is antisocial as fuck so stuck your rage where the sun don’t shine, sweetie.
Your reference to “respectful dissent” shows you don’t understand what the rule means - it is to encourage participation, ie posting and commenting. Blanket downvoting has exactly opposite effect discouraging participation.
