Any citizen of the social internet knows the feeling: that irritable contentiousness, that desire to get into it that seems almost impossible to resist, even though you know you’ve already squandered too many hours and too much emotional energy on pointless internet disputes. If you use Twitter, you may have noticed that at least half the posts seemed intent on making someone—especially you—mad. In his new book, Outrage Machine, the technology researcher Tobias Rose-Stockwell explains that the underlying architecture of the biggest social media platforms is essentially (although, he argues, unintentionally) designed to get under your skin in just this way. The results, unsurprisingly, have been bad for our sanity, our culture, and our politics.

On this topic, an increasingly popular one as the social media economy convulses in response to Twitter’s Elonification, the preferred tone is either stern jeremiad or, for the well and truly addicted commentator (usually a journalist), a sort of punch-drunk nihilism much like that of someone who declares he’ll never quit smoking even though it’s going to kill him. Rose-Stockwell, by contrast, keeps his cool, pointing out that social media is full of “angry, terrible content” that makes our lives worse, while carefully avoiding any sign of partisanship or panic.

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This article is just a book advertisement. The closest thing it comes to an answer to the title is suggesting that “better algorithms and moderation, changes that will eventually produce content that users will value as more trustworthy.”

    yawn

    • sbv@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a book review. So it’s sort of an advertisement, if the reviewer doesn’t like it, they’ll say so.

      The writer comes to a similar conclusion to you in the last paragraph.