PugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoCongratulations on Brooklyn's rulemessage-squaremessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1445arrow-down112
arrow-up1433arrow-down1message-squareCongratulations on Brooklyn's rulePugJesus@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareExecutive Chimp@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoFun fact: my memory is shitty. Looks like you’re right except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.
minus-squareKazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 month ago except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time. But I included that, didn’t I? and back then “man” still refered to male and female persons Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.
minus-squareExecutive Chimp@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoFun fact: I can’t fucking read either.
Fun fact: my memory is shitty. Looks like you’re right except that “man” wasn’t gendered at the time.
But I included that, didn’t I?
Or do you mean rather than male and female, I should have said persons regardless of gender? I guess that makes more sense.
Fun fact: I can’t fucking read either.