It’s impressive how duckduckgo manages to be so much better than bing despite being a frontend for bing

  • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Racism justifies harassment and home invasion?

    Yeah. Not gonna cry over what the victims of racism do to racists.

    and more about the harassment veiled in false civility as a means of silencing discussion.

    How is the sea lion silencing discussion? They weren’t discussing anything, they were having a racist circlejerk. The racist lady said a racist thing and the sea lion invited discussion by asking, “Why did you say that racist thing?” and then they refused to actually explain why they’re racist against sea lions, treating it as self-evident that being racist against sea lions is correct and thus that it is unreasonable to question it.

    Pretend he’s not a sea lion, but a conservative

    He can’t choose not to be a sea lion. This is kind of incoherent. “Pretend he’s not black, but a conservative.” This sea lion could also be conservative, that doesn’t really have anything to do with the fact that he’s being criticized for immutable properties he was born with, not for anything of substance.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Again sea lioning is a type of behavior not a type of person or being. As a form of humor they rather than have a person embody the behavior be a literal sea lion because whimsical tension between the metaphorical sea lion also being an actual sea lion is funny.

      • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        That just doesn’t work, because the sea lion’s behavior in the comic is entirely reasonable, and it is the other characters who are being unreasonable. If the point of the comic is that the sea lion’s behavior is bad, they should have actually made the sea lion do something bad instead of call out someone being racist against him

          • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I literally already explained that in the comment you’re replying to. The sea lion should have done something bad to deserve being criticized.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not gonna cry over what the victims of racism do to racists.

      Eh…I dunno. I’m not going to tone police anyone, and consequences for bad actions are definitely good, but do two very-wrongs make a kinda-right? I’m not sold.

      [the rest]

      Look…if you don’t vibe with the comic, that’s fine. It’s just obviously not about all the stuff that you seem to think it’s about.

      • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s just obviously not about all the stuff that you seem to think it’s about.

        But it literally is? You’re the one coming up with weird interpretations about “what if it was actually about xyz”

        What is actually happening in the comic is that a character is being racist and the victim of that racism is portrayed as being wrong and annoying for calling out the racism. That’s literally what’s happening in the comic. It doesn’t require any kind of gymnastics or interpretation, that’s the surface level reading of what is occurring in the comic.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No. What is actually happening in the comic is that a character is having a discussion with another person (not a racist conversation, because sea lions are not sentient beings despite what is about to happen). Treating it as anything more than that is reading something into the story not intended by the original comic. Not everything is so literal, particularly with Malki comics.

          • BlackDragon@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            not a racist conversation, because sea lions are not sentient beings despite what is about to happen

            sea lions literally are sentient beings in the context of the comic. the only justification the comic gives for why sea lions are bad requires them being sentient beings so that they can speak up against random racist tirades about them.

            are you literate

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’m a simple man. You go into ad hominem territory, I leave the conversation. See ya.