• pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Taxing the rich doesn’t solve wage suppression and housing demand. It could be used to help solve inflation if the government committed to use the additional taxation to reduce the money supply rather than spend it, but I doubt that’s what you had in mind.

    So, sorry, we probably should look into our tax regime but it’s not the silver bullet you think it is.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Putting a wealth tax on the ultra rich and properly tax companies by removing loopholes in our tax system could bring in enough money to fund practically every social program that we have and some that we need.

      Right now, companies and the ultra rich who are behind these companies are taking advantage of an education system that trains their workforce, a healthcare system that keeps their workers healthy and productive, infrastructure that allows their employees to get to work and also allows them to communicate, provide services and move their products. Yet, it’s the working class that has the burden of financing all of this. Meanwhile companies get tax breaks and subsidies. How is that fair?

      Our whole system is crumbling because the working class is getting increasingly poor and can no longer afford to support all of this. People’s pay don’t reflect the productivity and profits of companies anymore. Most profits are from capital gains now.

      Taxing this may not be the only solution, but it would help to fix a vast majority of the problems were facing.

        • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Fraser Institute’s 2023 report suggests that the top income-earning families — those making just under $250,000 — pay the majority of Canada’s taxes.

          First of all. It’s the Fraser institute. It’s a Conservative think tank that favors the rich elites in all their so called research.

          Additionally, a combined income of $250k isn’t “rich” by today’s standard. That’s fairly middle class. Upper middle class maybe but still middle class. It takes about that much in combined household wages to afford a big enough home, utilities and food for a family with kids to live comfortably but not in any luxury whatsoever, especially in urban areas.

          These are not the people I’m talking about.

          • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You are insane if you think it takes a $250k family income to live comfortably anywhere in this country except major urban centres.

              • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Not really sure what you want me to say… Plenty of people with kids are living comfortably with kids making far less than $250k/year as a combined family.

                  • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    My family makes slightly under $100k / year and I consider our life to be comfortable.

                    I have several friends with Kidd that are under the $150k/year mark that live comfortably as far as I know. The only one that doesn’t is the one that wants to live in a major urban centre (who also happen to be the ones with the highest income by far).