• Nelots@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t mind silent e’s, they do actually change the way words are pronounced at least.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        In that persons comment, they removed several “silent” e’s, but all but one changed the word’s pronunciation. I was talking about them. Like the E in hate. It doesn’t make a sound itself, so isn’t it still silent?

        • optional@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s not silent, but in the wrong place. Haet would be more correct, as it changes the pronunciation from [hæt] to [heɪt]. Hait might be an even better way to write it (see also: bait, maid, laid etc.)

          English is a weird language.

          • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            English is three languages wearing a trench coat and pretending to be one.

            I just now realized that the word “trench” is in “trench coat”.

            […] heavy-duty fabric,[1] originally developed for British Army officers before the First World War, and becoming popular while used in the trenches, hence the name trench coat.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trench_coat

    • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They work like an e after a vowel, making it a long vowel, but with a letter in between. They have absolutely no reason to exist as haet is pronounced the same as hate but has the letters in a more logical order.