Forks are used by developers to not only “fork an application”, but also just to fork the repo, work on their own branches, and push (PR) them back to the main repo. I have forks of many repos, but that doesn’t mean “i have forked the application under a new name”.

Oracle can suck it

Piece of shit company

Piece of shit owner

I’ll check it out some time

I set it up earlier and it felt like a highschool project. The AiO bloat, the GUI, lots of little bugs everywhere… The service didn’t even stop when I ran i2p stop.

I’m not against it, but I do hope it gets a lot better.

So neither were vaxed?

I don’t think they care about piracy.

I replied to:

With snap they can release the package a single time, and it can be used across all of their releases. I think this is the main point of snap. Being able to use it across other systemd distros is just a bonus.

I’m not saying they would.

Yeah but only in 2016 were they made available for other Linux distros. Flatpaks were available since 2015.

Using 12hr notation is a bigger joke though.

I don’t understand. A 24hr clock would be prophetic? Or the time 20:28?

24hr clocks are used wordwide except for a few countries. The image in the OP looks Czech and the Czech Republic uses 24hr notation.

From my experience, those discussions only happen when Distros are compared.

When I’m talking to other Linux people, there has never been any competition, and as long as you are using Linux you are a bro.

You’re just describing flatpack.

Nope. This seems like a stupid rule.

Transplant guidelines in Ontario and much of Canada require patients with ALD to first qualify for a deceased donor liver. If they don’t meet that criteria, they aren’t considered for a living liver transplant, even if one is available.

It was perfectly possible with her partners liver. This is just “no you didn’t do what we want so we just let you die”, and you’re here trying to justify that.

Isn’t it about her chance to get one though? “There was no process for a second review or appeal.”

You have a window were you can’t drink any alcohol for biological safety reasons, but in this case the mere rule of not drinking alcohol was enforced. This makes it a punishment instead of some biological requirement.

Some time ago I had to go under general anesthesia to have some teeth pulled. Local anesthesia didn’t work. I wasn’t allowed to eat for 24 hours. But I was so hungry that I ate just enough to not have stomach pain anymore. In the hospital I said I ate a tiny bit, and they said that it wouldn’t be much of a problem if I only ate a bit. Compared to the OP story, I wasn’t punished because I was still within the safe window.

Why should somebody get punished by a hospital? They should be neutral. “Oh you drank alcohol? You’ll have to come back later because of safety reason”. They shouldn’t be the judge. Giving them that power is just stupid.

I completely disagree. People should be able to make mistakes. Stopping upon diagnosis is the best she could have done. If she continued drinking after getting a new liver, that would be a different story.

I hate this “get shunned out of society because you aren’t perfect” culture.

Wrong speak

Chadman would never say brrrrrrr

Most people being called out for cheaters are not cheaters.