Well who else is he gonna exercise?
- 1 Post
- 161 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 6th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·3 days agoIt’s just any time there’s that much excitement, it must be no good, you know?
I interpreted “it” in the post title as referring to Linux. Firefox is “just a browser,” but Linux is not.
Four! I thought oh his puke looks like a Pacman pill because space people eat space food and I guess it’s like that.
In addition, just hear me out: It is giant’s bread.
0·28 days agoYeah that’s a good point about Amazon URLs. You really just need the product ID. So like Amazon produces this URL:
But I can pare that down to just this:
For anyone who wants to take this seriously but doesn’t know what to do:
TL;DR: Chop off everything after the question mark.
Usually these trackers are at the end of the URL, after a ?. That’s called the “query string parameters” of the URL, and it’s where developers will attach extra information for the server or page. Often, those are benign and useful: It’s a token that identifies you to the server, or it’s context about what you’re trying to do. Sometimes you can eyeball the query string params and guess what they do, e.g.:
coolvideos.com/videos/5432?fullscreen=true&autoplay=true&time=12021
or
cheapshoes.com/search?query=adidas+tennis&category=womens&filter=discounted
or
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
If you chopped off everything after the question mark, the URL should still work, it’d just give you a default version of that page. In both of these examples, there would be no privacy risk to sharing these URLs somewhere.
But query string params are also where alot of marketing/tracking bullshit goes. When you see URLs with UTM params like “utm_medium” and “utm_campaign”, that’s marketing bullshit. They can also contain info about who you are, like what OP is describing: If it’s some kind of referral link for example, then it might look like pyramidscheme.com/special-offer?associate_id=455&source=facebook. It might be esoteric too, like the “igsh” param in OP’s post (which I assume is short for “Instagram share” or something?). That WOULD be a privacy concern.
So yeah… Often you can eyeball it and figure out what (if anything) to remove… And if in doubt, try chopping off the question mark and everything following it, and see if the URL still works.
Because he dodges bullets, Avi.
At a specific time of year, in a specific part of the country.
Boris the Blade? As in… Boris the bullet dodger?
Yeah, it sounded like the detectives(…?) were going to lay out some of the details of the complaint, but she get-the-fuck-out’d them before they got there.
It matters quite a lot IMO what she was doing. Are we talking about dozens of harrassing/threatening DMs on multiple platforms? Or are we talking about heated comments on public posts? She said “I never threatened anyone,” etc. but that’s what they all say. I’m not suggesting she’s lying, there’s just no signal.
I hope we get to see the posts in question at some point.
And being on a track in a controlled environment. Going anywhere near this speed on a shared road is absolutely unconscionable in any conditions.
1·2 months agoIn a narrow sense, it’s useful for like… e.g. location-based search…So of you search “cosmetic dentistry,” it’s useful to privilege results closer to you (or at least you could make that argument). But broadly, in practice, “personalization” is primarily optimized for the ad buyer or first-party company’s goals (e.g. engagement, click-through) as per phases 2 and 3 of the enshittification cycle… And we know what happens to secondary goals as systems become increasingly optimized.
So I’m not claiming that it can’t be los dos, and indeed in phase 1 it definitely is… I’m claiming that it isn’t los dos, in practice, at this moment in history.
Great question – Because the process of enshittification requires the subordination of the user’s interests to the interests of businesses (ad buyers, in Google’s case), which in turn will be subordinated to the interests of shareholders. In principle, it should be possible to balance los dos in a pro-consumer, non-cynical way, but in practice, more line go up. Line must go up. Enshittification optimizes for line go up.
Small typo: You spelled “ad buyer” wrong.
Yeah, someone should definitely do that. I think this is written from the perspective of a security researcher communicating with others in the security world about a discovery they made, so it’s a) dense to read, and b) not thorough as a consumer guide.
Hopefully someone follows up with a resource like you describe.
AFAICT, keeping the TV offline (i.e. not connected to any wifi) and plugging in a laptop/Chromecast/etc. via HDMI would eliminate both sides of the problem. You can still use streaming services on the laptop, but the TV would be unable to phone home.
There’s always the yar har option as well, which is also effectively implemented with a laptop.
0·2 months agoI generally agree with the idea that “stampede” is usually the wrong concept to describe these events, and probably the wrong approach to understanding them. Even in the Iroquois Theater case, I think if you eliminated the panic component, the death toll would have been significantly lower (maybe zero), but it still wasn’t really the same dynamics as a stampede.
People don’t die because they panic. They panic because they are dying.
Por que no los dos? Crowd crush incidents don’t require panic (see: 2015 Mina “stampede”), but it’s hard to imagine that e.g. the Iroquois Theater Fire wasn’t significantly worsened by the (justifiable) panic of the crowd.
Of course the primary reason in both cases is related to the spaces that the crowds were inhabiting… But the effect of panic pretty clearly multiplies the effect IMO.
Can confirm. Mine will take about 3 days to charge from very low to full on a regular wall outlet. Still worth it sometimes though, like when I’m visiting family or camping or something. If I’m gonna spend the day somewhere (like 6+ hours, let’s say) it might be worth it.