But even in that case it’s 10x better to have more frequent, cheaper diesel trains than having insanely expensive and heavy battery trains.
But even in that case it’s 10x better to have more frequent, cheaper diesel trains than having insanely expensive and heavy battery trains.
What we have today masquerading as Star Trek is cheap, low effort garbage that tries to make up for it by wasting its budget on as much off the shelf CGI sparkles that can be thrown at
Strange new worlds is good though. And it’s “true trek”. You know, with more than 1 character doing all the things. A full diverse crew with diverse skills working together to solve issues and having fun.
After Discovery and Picard, it’s really refreshing. And even though it’s reusing old characters, it’s not in your face constantly the nostalgia.
A lower cut. 30% revenue cut means we pay more than necessary for games and we also miss out on some indie games that cannot be profitable with such a large cut.
Sorry, it looks like the link was lost when cross-posting. I updated the post
I think the epic store is much lower.
Ultimately the 30% is as high as Steam estimates they can charge before they have to fear companies leaving their platform and bypassing steam altogether. Honestly I’m surprised it has not happened yet. 30% is super high, and users are not at all locked down like they are in the console market.
Does it?
They can also just sell the game on other platforms no?
Unlike every other company in their position they’re not complete assholes to consumers :
Most companies in their position would lock their users in, they don’t. That doesn’t mean they can’t be abusive though. 30% of game revenue is huge!
It will just force them to document and open up their APIs and protocols.
Even just some text informing the user “You can’t see this content on lemmy.world. Please go to the instance directly"
That would have to be supported by Lemmy, which I believe is currently not the case.
I have not yet find evidence that Ubisoft will delete accounts with owned games and they claim they won’t so…
But google also participated to the creation of JPEG-Xl.
And having “their” standard win does not make any sense to me to see where they benefit from it.
What does google gains by making AVIF win rather than AVIF?
Because the UX is horrible and they (especially matrix) have a ton of privacy/security issues that Signal doesn’t have
I watched lower decks and I’m also confused
Chokepoint capitalism.
They mention the game because it’s made by a coop.
That’s not going to happen within the lifetime of the batteries of the trains though.