Aren’t apps better compareable to something like flatpack and this is the reason why they are updateable during runtime?
Aren’t apps better compareable to something like flatpack and this is the reason why they are updateable during runtime?
Cinnamon or something idk I use qtile
I also never used version pinning in debian
I broke a hinge myself that way, learned it the hard way
Did you open it without the backplate on?
Anyways this is crappy anti consumer design by the manufacturer.
I don’t fall for this, I switch back to Windows
I agree, I wouldn’t suggest arch to a newbie either, but OP said he has experience with arch
I daily drive Arch for about 7 years, therefore I’m clearly biased. But I love Arch for the AUR and the ease of getting packages. For me, it is the best OS on desktop to get things done. For other use cases, I would probably choose a different OS, but desktop is Arch all the way.
But you’r mileage may vary.
So many forks for something that can be solved entirely with bash inbuilts
I guess all of the mentioned are for rich people?
I think the licesing models and pricing are more interesting.
Thats what I would choose, from left to right:
RHEL, Mint, Arch, LFS
Might also switch the last two
I agree on your take, but I don’t think that “future scaling” is a concern for the most home users.
Yeah, it is a lot of initial work, but once you got your shell.nix or flake.nix in place it is really nice, to not have to deal with different dependencies and versions in different projects.
But you can also archive the same on any distro with the nix package manager.
How could you tell it was secure?
I mean it is similar confusing
Wie bitte lezte Preis?