Usually prefaced by “We value your privacy”.
No. Fuck you… You only care about your own morbidly obese bottom line, and there is a law obligating you to ask/extort/trick us into consenting.
Usually prefaced by “We value your privacy”.
No. Fuck you… You only care about your own morbidly obese bottom line, and there is a law obligating you to ask/extort/trick us into consenting.
But whether these sleep disturbances are caused solely by changes in gravity or by a combination of other factors, such as altered light exposure, diet, noise, and elevated stress levels during spaceflight, is still unclear.
Imo the elevated stress levels are a much more logical cause than gravity changes. I wonder what made the researchers ‘gravitate’ to this conclusion.
English letters
U_w0t_M8
That’s very concrete language you’re using there. Are you perchance an introvert? We could make it n = 41 and add a dash more selection bias to boot!
That’s not flying, that’s just falling with style.
That would’ve made her look stupid, hadn’t she already been racewalking.
That was another AI-related ‘mishap’:
https://www.vice.com/en/article/dy3jbz/scientific-journal-frontiers-publishes-ai-generated-rat-with-gigantic-penis-in-worrying-incident
Wouldn’t that also mean women with (many) children die younger?
“These pears represent good luck” Hao said, laughing his way to the bank.
Orders with no tip might take longer to get delivered — are you sure?
Well, I ‘might’ not order from you again then — are you sure?
But writing a program is all about expressing your intent in a programming language, step by step. It’s about “communicating” with the machine (and your users).
And your coworkers, and ‘you a year from now’. For the love of god have some compassion with ‘you a year from now’ and save him a day of debugging.
My guess is that would also occur with valid but non-existing e-mail addresses no? The regex would not be a remedy there anyway.
Of course you should only use the supplied e-mail address for things like mass mailings once it has been verified (i.e. the activation link from within the mail was clicked)
Probably, from what I can see the address in question isn’t really that exotic. but an email regex that validates 100% correctly is near impossible. And then you still don’t know if the email address actually exists.
I’d just take the user at their word and send an email with an activation link to the address that was supplied. If the address is invalid, the mail won’t get delivered. No harm done.
the Rocky Linux picture should show:
being forced to use the filter drip coffee because Red Hat poisoned the ‘looks pretty cool’ coffee method.
Sure. Then imho if he can’t say it definitively, he should not make the first claim (slipping in weasel words like ‘could’ and ‘up to’ serve as a lazy catch-all disclaimer in that case.)
“What we found is that consuming high amounts of ultra-processed foods could increase your risk of developing depression by up to 50%”
and
“He said that … they cannot say highly processed food causes depression”
Those statements sound contradictory (Or do they mean that it ‘could’ be 50% or 0%? But if so, why say anything at all)
It looks extremely al dente.