Yes, you can craft your prompt in such a way that if the llm doesn’t know about a referenced legal document it will ask for it, so you can then paste the relevant section of that document into the prompt to provide it with that information.
I’d encourage you to look up some info on prompting LLMs and LLM context.
They’re powerful tools, so it’s good to really learn how to use them, especially for important applications like legalese translators and rent negotiators.
Generally, training an llm is a bad way to provide it with information. “In-context learning” is probably what you’re looking for. Basically just pasting relevant info and documents into your prompt.
You might try fine tuning an existing model on a large dataset of legalese, but then it’ll be more likely to generate responses that sound like legalese, which defeats the purpose
TL;DR Use in context learning to provide information to an LLM Use training and fine tuning to change how the language the llm generates sounds.
Looks like they got that number from this quote from another arstechnica article ”…OpenAI admitted that its AI Classifier was not “fully reliable,” correctly identifying only 26 percent of AI-written text as “likely AI-written” and incorrectly labeling human-written works 9 percent of the time”
Seems like it mostly wasn’t confident enough to make a judgement, but 26% it correctly detected ai text and 9% incorrectly identified human text as ai text. It doesn’t tell us how often it labeled AI text as human text or how often it was just unsure.
EDIT: this article https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/07/openai-discontinues-its-ai-writing-detector-due-to-low-rate-of-accuracy/
Probably money. Given enough money, I’m sure tiktok will ban any search term
People are dumb.
I have to disagree. I’ve been conducting interviews for a fairly large software shop (~2000 engineers) for about 3 years now and, unless I’m doing an intern or very entry level interview, I don’t care what language they use (both personally and from a company interviewer policy), as long as they can show me they understand the principles behind the interview question (usually the design of a small file system or web app)
Most devs with a good understanding of underlying principles will be able to start working on meaningful tasks in a number of days.
It’s the candidates who spent their time deep diving into a specific tool or framework (like leaving a rails/react boot camp or something) that have the hardest time adjusting to new tools.
Plus when your language/framework falls out of favor, you’re left without much recourse.
A programming language itself isn’t a marketable skill!
Learn the underlying concepts of programming and how computers work and you’ll be able to move from language/framework to pretty much any language/framework easily.
I think rust is good for learning some low level concepts, especially coming from python.
I don’t think Python is going anywhere in the ML space though.
BuT coORPEratIOns arE PeOplE
“In collectives” gives me big brave new world vibes.
Regulation doesn’t automatically mean better.
You can make regulations that benefit large real estate corporations and that’s still regulation.
We have a lot of that in the parts of US. There are rules encouraging landlords to keep high rental rates bc if they lowered it, they’d have to offer that to other renters as well. Many landlords choose to have empty rooms and keep that high rental rate.
You have no idea why? Really? It’s to get people thinking about / trying bing.
It’s all advertising.
We’re going to enter another search engine (read chatbot) war.
Governments like to assume that once something is illegal , it’ll just stop within their borders
I don’t think you’re right about nvidia. Their hardware is used for SO much more than AI. They’re fine.
Plus their own AI products are popping off rn. DLSS and their frame generation one (I forget the name) are really popular in the gaming space.
I think they also have a new DL-based process for creating stencils for silicon photolithography which, in my limited knowledge, seems like a huge deal.
Exoprimal is pretty darn fun
Yeah but the headline should let me know what the story is and make me interested. Not make me think the author is complaining that their SSD died.
I don’t care about that. I don’t want to read an article about that.
They should’ve made a better headline
Idk all the details of the current wotc controversy train, but If an AI generates a base image that gets refined by a human, is not that human-created?
Plus like you know that $60 isn’t for the art or the time it took to make the art. It’s for the Dnd brand.
They’d charge $60 even if it was made in an afternoon
But…. Isn’t most art made on computers nowadays?
Indexing and tools like llamaindex use LLM generated embeddings to “intelligently” search for similar documents to a search query.
Those documents are usually fed into an LLM as part of the prompt (eg. context)