O-oh, uwould youwu wook at the time! :3

If their spam filter is “learning,” and if new signup verification emails are a consistent decades-old practice, how much longer should we wait before it’s okay to question whether Google’s filter could do better at learning?

Who do you feel the need to convince of this? Yourself? Lol

Yep I’ve been witnessing it for years and I still have no idea how to wrap my head around what is happening

Wait’ll you hear which one came first

Headcanon bonus joke: Mario’s hand gesturing a single pea looks like he’s just making the Italian hand gesture, adding to Luigi’s confusion

Luigi: “guess it needs to be top shelf pee!”

You seem eager to pose this “if the product was undamaged” as if you can quantify what might have happened differently, but then in a comment below you ask someone else to prove that maintainers left.

It might shock you to learn that products are developed by people. Actual people stay or leave and work wildly differently based on things like respect, expectations, and being in a hostile environment.

Want proof of that? Go work on an actual project with a team sometime.

edit - And this isn’t even accounting for the ways toxic communication impedes wider adoption of a product

The same way we confuse earnestness with trash clickbait tactics I guess

That’s wonderful for you, but it does happen.

Many in Utah think they’re Midwest too. It’s wild. (In my case their answers to me indicated they didn’t know where the Midwest is, not that they identified with it)

It’s not

Tragically you still have your bloodthirsty blue Dotharl sis to remind you of it forever

hashed out

heheh

In addition to the wealth of experiences and opinions in this thread, it is worth reminding:

2 is a really small sample size

Last panel inaccurate, games were vibrant and awesome

Just like the ones today that will feel amateurish compared to future immersive games. Give it time