Trans what now?

Hunter is asking the real questions, take notes journalism

I still think the bear question is completely loaded

I would ALWAYS choose the bear. Everyone I know would ALWAYS choose the bear. If the random man was a person they were close to, most people would STILL choose the bear because bears are rad as hell

https://youtube.com/shorts/E0InQkKyR54?si=Kkd_4VRog6yDp2Zg

smh how can you tell him from the lady dwarves now

Captive audience

“why do people call out person they know and not nameless faces they dont???”

Hey, now. Trains do end the occasional pedestrian, but it’s not so much hit as much obliterate

deleted by creator

These SICK LEFTISTS are going to FORCE THE CUM LOAF on you

If they reprocessed it in a way that posed miniscule health hazards and didn’t taste off I would not care

I’ve eaten hotdogs before, and they’re often found to contain HUMAN meat, what difference does it make

Unironically (within reason) I do not care where my proteins come from if they taste good enough and are renewable

Why would I pay $600 to play the same games but worse

not enough tbh

Please let me live in the world where they were internationally disgraced and every pundit that used them as a resource equally disgraced

RIP in Piss P. Veritas I hope hell is hot for you on the way down

You don’t generally search with YouTube shorts, it presents you with content About 20% is YOUR recommendations (channels you subscribe to) 20% is near-interests (people who do similar content) 20% is whatever is popular at the moment, or whatever a la carte foreign language/low effort content (garena free fire, fortnite) it wants to give you 20% is locational (at home I get anime recommendations due to housemate, at work I get Vegas/Disney vacation or AI garbage) 20% is whatever the algorithm is pushing (channels I have BLOCKED but still appear, tiktok exiles, cooking videos)

Depends entirely on what you’re subscribed to, if you have multiple linked youtube accounts (such as the premium family plan) it depends on what THEY’RE subscribed to, and depends on location (my recommendations at home and my recommendations at work are wildly different)

Making legal precedent so that they AVOID showing the offending content instead of PROMOTING the offending content is probably the goal

About 30-40 times a day, Youtube shorts shows me videos actively advocating violence, and I know for sure that Google has enough money and resources currently to prevent these videos being shown, considering it AUTOMATICALLY SUBTITLES THEM

Human experience considers context, experience, and relation to previous works

‘AI’ has the words verbatim in it’s database and will occasionally spit them out verbatim