Many people still drive older cars due to costs and environmental factors, meanwhile there’s no real reason to use an old version of a word processing software unless you really want to due to nostalgic reasons. And automatic braking doesn’t even exist on every new car…
Not really, autosave has been a thing for so many years at this point
Do you think this is what “conservative” means, like completely honestly?
Haha I’m swedish actually so I understand what you mean! I never get tired of watching videos of Americans trying our salty “djungelvrål” licorice, the second they get it on their tongue they almost puke, meanwhile I can’t get enough
I love a bunch of Turkish sweets and have the pleasure of having authentic Turkish sweets available close to me, but man I just really dislike Turkish delights lol
But Turkish sweets are usually the most sugar filled (and greasiest…) sweets you can find? And I guess that’s why I love them lol
This but unironically, as a european I can’t imagine having only two choices on such an enormously important choice for a democracy
Microsoft open-sourced all of dotnet core, which is arguably the largest and most well-maintained (with exceptions) collection of tools/platforms for developers that exsists to date. So, I don’t really agree that they’re just “making face”
As someone born in 99', I know we all used to rave about the Simpsons back when the movie came out, and we used to watch the movie in school pretty much every opportunity we could, but after that we pretty much "moved on"…
Wanna trade with my 1989 Toyota? 😄
If it works for you then that’s what matters!
You’ve never EVER had to just “charge real quick” before you head out with low battery? Really?
It’s just so incredibly sloooooow
So you mean that eating meat is taboo for an absolutely tiny proportion of the world? How could that possibly be relevant?
Meat consumption is taboo? Where do you live, farmville?
Now I am actually honestly not sure if you are actually being serious or if you are trying to troll.
“It’d be like me “playing around with the thought of powering all of America with renewables” and suggesting our only course of action with renewables is putting a giant dome over Hawaii to harness geothermal power from the active volcanoes and then running multiple 10ft thick cables 2,500 miles across the Pacific in order to feed the mainland at a cost of 200 trillion dollars and a 100 year supply of copper. It’s an absurd and misleading proposal.”
Have you been smoking crack perhaps?
Yes I could have clarified that I was discussing solar but I thought the context of the conversation was enough. But sure, “renewables” was bad formulation on my part.
I took it he was quoting a title after the “:” but I get it.
Maybe you should try reading the comment I was replying too?
Very funny how everything that you don’t agree with suddenly becomes “right wing”. But please prove me wrong, provide me with said “right wing think tank” that I supposedly copied from. Shouldn’t be hard to find if that’s the case.
If you take a look at the comment that I was replying to, you will have your answer for the first question.
Because it was the scenario I chose. You are more than welcome to submit your own analysis with your own scenario and eventual limitations etc.
I didn’t include coal plants because we weren’t talking about coal plants. You are more than welcome to submit your own rundown including coal plants.
Solar is not one of the “most expensive” forms of renewable.
If you didn’t find the analysis helpful, you are once again, more than welcome to submit your own. The analysis is very helpful in the context of the comment I replied too.
Pretty much every northern European country has had it since the 80s. Nowadays we melt it into new packaging though, supposedly it requires even less energy. And you get money for turning them in :)