Mosquitos have entered the chat.
But really, pollinating insects have been extremely rare this past year. It’s alarming, and nobody seems to care.
Mosquitos have entered the chat.
But really, pollinating insects have been extremely rare this past year. It’s alarming, and nobody seems to care.
It was about blackface, which you know very well. No-one has ever been offended by “whiteface”, because of what fucking happened in history.
Not all white people share the same history, man. If you think that any white person is the same as every white person, then you’re being a real racist.
Nazis brutalized my family, so fuck you for thinking I would ever be ok with som “white lives matter” cunts. You are an asshole.
My dude, I hate racists.
I also have a sense of humour, so stuff like comedy and costumes aren’t places where I tend to judge people. If I did, I’d think that most black and brown comedians were racist, and that most white ones were pedophiles or rapists. But I don’t.
My comment was in response to the question about people using <insert colour> face during that time, and it seemed to be more common than some of us can remember.
I don’t know anything about the guy in question, and it seems silly to judge him based on a basketball player costume he wore on Halloween almost 20 years go. We should use some common sense here.
Well, just a few years earlier than this guy’s black face, a movie called White Chicks came out… two black dudes playing white face in an entire Hollywood movie (coincidently, filmed in B.C).
I don’t ever recall outrage over it, though.
That said, I guess we’re lucky that our politicians are only playing black face during costume parties, rather than wearing white hoods during regular business hours! LOL
I was under the impression software engineering, despite the layoffs, was still a pretty liquid market.
I went to pick up an order at Walmart not too long ago (months), and the guy who brought it out was chatting me up. Apparently, he’s a software engineer, but could only find work at Walmart.
These are grim times.
I’m of the opinion that if a roof can’t support a few extra hundred pounds, the entire house is compromised.
Wet snow can add thousands of pounds of weight to a roof, so a solar panel (which can actually deflect a lot of heavy snow), really should be no problem at all.
That said, it’s incredibly disappointing that home insurance companies are causing difficulties for people who want to adopt greener tech.
Funny thing is, CAA (the company mentioned in the article) will insure e-bikes without any issues (a fire risk in any home), but state that the risks of these solar panels would be problematic? I think they’re just picking and choosing what they want to cover, without any evidence supporting their position.
Don’t post on social media, especially under your real name.
This includes posting when you’ll be out of the house (I.e. vacation), or the details/names of family members.
Run an adblocker with strict tracker protection on every device you use, and opt for the web version of a product, rather than an app.
Use aliases and throwaway email addresses to anything that requires an account. If they end up being something you use, and are required to provide real information, move forward with caution.
Really, though, the worst thing you can do is post on social media.
Yes, but I’m sure there’s some tax benefit to calling it a food bank. #RecordProfits
Is it a coincidence that a guide to identifying Nazis was right below this post? LOL
That Sounds Great! But Will It Work on My Phone? Currently, GrapheneOS is supported on Google Pixel devices only…
Aaaaaand, you lost me.
I’ve got so many spare phones that I’d love to install this on. Not a single one is from Google. They screwed me once with their hardware (Pixelbook), and I don’t feel like giving them any more money.
The OS itself doesn’t serve ads, but rather the apps you install and the web pages you visit.
I don’t know what phone you use, but a stock Samsung phone absolutely serves ads and tracks like crazy. You can monitor the activity with something like Adguard. Not to mention the bloat like Facebook will call home even when you aren’t using it.
So yeah, it would be nice if the OS itself wasn’t an open door for this type of crap.
But who is targeting the lack of pension for many ordinary Canadians?
But there is stilll enough helpful content that the whoe thing isn’t worthless and I doubt it ever will be.
The people creating that content will fade away.
They are going to be competing with a tireless algorithm that can out out 1000x the content they can, with next to no “staff”.
Those AI content creators will be making money for someone, and legitimate content creators won’t be able to keep up unless: they use AI content creation; or have a business model that will probably result in all legitimate websites being paywalled, filled with ads, or becoming a marketing platform for brands (worse than what modern day YouTube is like).
I agree with all of that. AI has it’s valid uses.
But the way we are seeing it being utilised is often simply to flood every corner of the internet with spam, bad information, low quality content, and loads of filler.
I’m personally amazed by what AI can do with photo generation, music creation, and other creative work.
But at the same time, I want to know that it’s AI generated and not passed off as human created content. Especially with written content.
AI-based tools can be amazing, but only if ethics are applied to their use.
The majority of the internet is porn.
Again, I’ll separate entertainment from informational, since entertainment can be garbage, and still be consumed.
Bad information doesn’t help anyone.
it’s not like LLMs you can chat with are completely useless.
The problem is, you wouldn’t know unless you know.
With a legitimate website that has human writers, editors, and fact-checkers, they can at least have creditability and a reputation to uphold.
Far too many randomly generated websites have a lot of information, but without any guardrails. If you know enough about a topic, you’ll realise that the information on these AI sites are pretty much useless. That is, you couldn’t use them as a source because enough of the info is bad/incorrect/incoherent, that it’s like asking a toddler who may or may not give you a valid question.
I’ve contacted a manufacturer of bike stuff, and their support is given by AI. While the answers you get sound like they could be right, it’s like getting an answer from someone who heard something about something from a friend. When you actually ask for a human, the answer is often different (and correct).
There is no accountability, or credibility, or responsibility, or integrity with AI. It has no reputation to lose if the information it provides is bad or not.
I know that AI isn’t going away. I’d personally be OK with some human verification system for websites, and would be more than willing to use a filtered version of the internet that blocks AI generated content. Call it curated or whitelisted, but I want my information to come from a human being.
But you know they are spam, so it’s something you can avoid. But what if the majority (over 80%) of the calls you receive can’t be identified as spam. At some point, you may be wasting far more time than it’s worth to keep using a phone without some major whitelist/blacklist system.
Also, what happens when the outbound calls you make are answered by AI, and you don’t know? If this AI is giving you replies that are word salad, how long are you willing to tolerate it?
I’ve been getting text messages now from companies that I actually do business with, but they are spam. Calls from companies that I have accounts with, and they are scams. At some point, SMS and phone calls will be more trouble than its worth.
And the thought of either having to go without it, the pain of replacing it, or the frustration of being strung along in a scam are not thoughts I want to have.
There will always be a large number of sites that are not capitalist hellholes that only exist to steal user’s data or scam users or do other malicious things. This may be down to things like credit unions, federated social media, and non-profits that exist to make the world better, but there will always be something that is out there that keeps it from being useless.
No doubt that there will be people who still have morals and will run sites and services that don’t completely screw people.
But at some point, you won’t be able to tell which are legit, and which aren’t. AI generated websites can make any scam site look completely legitimate, fake thousands of testimonials, have bots post about it on every major website (Reddit, YouTube, etc.) without being caught, etc.
The currency of the internet is no longer about what’s valuable to users, but what’s valuable to bad actors, data thieves, and marketers.
There will be a tipping point when the bad far, far outweighs the good, and I’m curious to know when society decides that the internet isn’t worth using anymore.
Let me ask you this: assuming you use the internet for information rather than entertainment, would the internet be useful if the majority of content ends up being AI generated (not fact checked, not accurate, and not original)?
What if the overwhelming content you come across could neither be verified as true, and the majority of comments (including here on Lemmy) were bots? Would you still use it?
For me, it would stop being useful. Almost like a library only carrying fiction, when I’m trying to research a topic.
For entertainment, sure, it’ll be great for sucking the attention from people without having to invest in skill to be good at something. Hell, if you currently find YouTube shorts and Tiktok to be “good content”, then it’ll be around forever. Corporations and advertisers love this technology.
I’ve been thinking a lot about the state of things, and where we are heading.
At what point do we consider the internet “useless”? It must be coming very soon (less than 2 years), since the majority of content will be AI generated and targeted, which drives down the value for users even further.
Once original ideas vanish, and you can’t trust any text/audio/video/photo you see, what will be the point? It’s like the internet will simply be a video game world with next to no value.
And I can’t see how society can possibly reverse this.
Keep going. Every failed attempt makes him look like poor leadership material. Not that his words and actions make him out to be good or anything, but still. 😂