Also symfonium
Also symfonium
I realize it’s not a satisfactory solution, since you won’t be able to use facilities like artist/album/etc to explore.
But in navidrome I think you can make a smart playlist based on file path, which you could use to include all of YOUR songs in the playlist if it is in a different root path.
And in this setup you can fairly easily use gluetun to force all its traffic through VPN
Anyone with Navidrome should consider trying this. It provides a means to create & modify the smart playlists graphically & makes it easier to rate songs with stars vs the web UI
Responding to myself…
Datasheet reports 7.05 idle watts (~11w at active random read) so depending on what it considers idle, it’d be 8*7.05|11= 56.4:88W
Server clocks in at ~102W. Halving the drives would reduce the power by 27 : 43%
And in theory other components (motherboard, CPU…) must be using anywhere from (102-88) :(102-56.4)= 14 : 45.6 W.
Thanks! I need to look more into what the power implications of 8 drives is - they never spin down, so I assume they are a non-trivial portion of my power consumption.
That said, I’ve been considering upgrading to something recent and low power anyways. It would be a good opportunity to sneak in some useful features too,
Which the old hardware wouldn’t support without adapters, cards, etc.
Proton, some of their paid exit nodes support P2P
Server - Desktop Tower
Raspberry pi
Thoughts - I’m considering downsizing. I don’t really need all that much space, and it can be a headache at times. With drive replacement costs on top of power (~$320 a year) I consider either going to a vps or downsizing to what could run on a small compute like the n100 or a raspberry pi5, etc.
Is .com fixed in some way to prevent the same scaling? I thought it was basically the domain sellers increasing the prices year over year
I’ve only just started looking myself, but theres agora online
https://agoranomic.org/index.html (the hamburger menu has a how to play option)
Also: https://blognomic.com/
I feel like using a@[IPv6:2001:db8::1]
is asking for trouble everywhere online.
But its tempting to try out, not many people would expect this.
36 TB server:
Raspberry pi:
Correct.
With normal split tunneling you can normally do something like this anyways, but it can be finicky to configure, and easy for something like DNS, etc to access the internet without your VPN in the middle. And sometimes if your VPN fails to connect, you could be connecting without your VPN.
By using docker with gluetun + qbit (I believe docker images for this setup exist already) you can force it to use only your VPN, and if the connection fails then your bittorrent client can’t connect. With gluetun all your bittorrent traffic would flow through your VPN, but there’s a way it can be configured to allow only your webui port to be accessed locally on your network