politics is not geometry ok?

Claiming that there is nothing between two points is certainly geometry.

Also calm down.

instance blocking

What’s that?

Well as someone who has never once visited the US I am shocked.

Left of what? This is the extraordinarily simple concept you’re not understanding. Whatever left is it has to be left of something. What’s referred to as progressivism in the US is mostly to the left of the political establishment, and media. It’s center/center-left compared to the population (depending on how you define progressivism).

If you’re just using your own personal desires as your calibration point, then good for you, nobody else should or does care though.

Left wing politics are more popular in the real world than they are in real world governments. The thing is that extremely online youth have absolutely no idea of just how far left they are.

In the US there are right wing and even more right wing.

Not at all how direction works.

I’m not sure what possible argument would work if you insist that there can be two different points that don’t have a midpoint. That’s primary school geometry.

This is just being obtuse for the sake of it.

I’m not sure you can have any kind of spectrum that doesn’t have a middle.

Riiiiight.

“I don’t know, so I’m not going to find out” is not the soundest logic I’ve seen.

I’m asking what you think centrism is if you think somewhere like publicfreakout is right wing.

If you think publicfreakout is right wing, where do you think the centre is?

Does that feel healthy? Do you only listen to the tiniest left most fringe?

How is the worlds biggest ad distributor also the worlds biggest browser maker without it being an anti-trust violation?